what do y'all think of this article?
>http://glasstire.com/2016/01/29/art-meets-4chan/
>>2374364
Is shit.
>>2374367
you should tell them
>>2374364
>art
>>2374364
>art
>>2374364
Well, it's shit. Also why ask /b/ anything, I think that in the year 2 0 1 6 people would be wiser than that. Oh and btw, hi Cody.
>>2374435
You would think Artwork/Critique would be more engaged than Random, do you really want to get shown up, glasstire is a national publication.
>>2374454
youre talking to people that are mainly focused on improving their art as a skill and take the technical aspects of it seriously
this is a place that is biased towards that so when you show modern art like that its not taken seriously unless it brings something to the table which these unfortunately did not
better luck next time kid
>>2374364
I for once actually proud of you idiots, not only did you fucking spot the obvious bait that:
>I get the feeling i'm being watched
post but you fucking straight up called out all that pretentious bullshit for what it was
You did Da Vinci, Robert Florczak, Loomis, Kim Jong Gi, etc. proud and I love you
Godspeed in your artistic dreams you magnificent bastards
