We're bringing them back, boys!
Post Giantess collages or collage requests.
>>2656672
>collage requests.
I'll do a simple request or two, if folks want to link to a nice collagable image of a woman posted somewhere here on /hr/. Bonus points if you also link to a suitable background image with matching perspective, lighting, etc.
>>2656672
>tfw collages is where almost every person who has this fetish got there start.
>>2656737
I want to get stepped on.
This is NEW.
>>2656737
Think S&M kinks.
Now take it to its logical fantastical conclusion.
Now imagine 80 ton tits.
>>2656737
The umbrella terms are simply "size fetish" or "Macrophilia" meaning lover of large things. The most popular variant is Giantess (as in female giant), the kind that focuses on girls. Its basically taking something you already like and multiplying that by several fold. Its also a power fantasy that appeals to many people who enjoy role reversal and enjoy situations that places the female in a position of being the one in charge where they can act as the initiators, the romantic pursuers, the protectors, the bigger spoons, the dominant partner etc.
>>2656674
where is this?
>>2656737
It's a power thing, to put it simply.
>>2656678
You gotta love Kim
>>2656676
kek!
I like regular sized woman, shrunken male.
It's been too long.
>>2656920
Looks like LA
Not enough Agnetis. Ever.
Careless/nonchalant is my favorite
I've only seen two of Sarah Underwood ever. Criminally underused.
>>2656676
This image of Taylor Swift may never be topped.
Blah blah blah weird fetish blah blah blah
>>2656970
as a masochist I can take a good shrinking.
>>2656987
i dont even consider myself a masochist t b h. i just really, really, really, really like womens feet.
"In the Game of Thrones, you win or you get crushed"
Watson or Stone?
Who would you rather as your goddess?
>>2656991
>as is this there is even a competition
Stone
>>2656991
stone has sexier feet
>>2656991
Watson.
Pic related. It's her.
>>2656991
Watson
>>2656991
They both have their points ... but generally I'd have to go with Watson!
>>2656974
Literally how I want to die. Bury me with a tit pls.
>>2656991
Stone. Watson has never been attractive to me. She looks weird.
>>2657080
More Stone.
I wish I had some shooping/editing skills to contribute here, I really like what's Been uploaded here so far.
>>2657131
It's never too late to start learning!
Wendy again.
I've had this image forever if anyone wants to use it.
>>2657160
how do you possess images from my dreams?
>>2656672
oh man i've waited for this thread
will post a ton in a bit, worst case scenario tomorrow
>>2657160
can anyone help with collaging?
I made this using GIMP and im not sure where to go with it? Can you match the colors/brightness of layers? Would anyone answer my questions?
>>2657188
It's been a while since I've used GIMP, so I can't give any program-specific suggestions, but I can try to help regardless.
At the end of the day, the main limitation here is just that the lighting of the two images don't match. The city is being lit strongly from a single direction while the woman is more evenly lit by the studio lighting. So it's going to be difficult to make it look like the layers match properly.
The woman herself is not emitting light, so you might want to try to emulate the look of the unlit portion of the city's buildings. The sides that aren't being illuminated directly by the sun or lights are very dark. So generally it might help to darken her overall (reducing the upper "output" level to reduce the value of the pixels).
Those buildings which are near the road by the water front are brightly illuminated by all those red/orange street lights. You might want to mimic this around the lower parts of her body by roughly drawing around them with a lasso/pen tool, feathering the selection a bunch, then increasing the brightness and red/yellow value of these parts. That might help make it look more like she's being illuminated by parts of the city.
Finally, the highlights on the woman (on the left parts of her leg, on the material over her breasts, etc) are generally facing the direction of the sun, so it might help to brighten the highlights slightly (reduce the upper "input" level a bit) and increase the red/yellow values of the highlight/bright pixels. In Photoshop you can do this with levels, but also with the "color balance" tool ... not sure what the GIMP equivalent is.
These are just a few quick potential suggestions. Not sure they'd actually look right, my approach to this kind of thing when collaging is to just fiddle with these kinds of changes to see what looks best. But as always, the best advice is to just spend that little bit of extra time trying to find background images with lighting that matches the woman.
>>2657290
>>2657295
>>2657295
this might be the perfect size for giantess
>>2657298
>>2657299
I'm more into SM stuff, but I'm generally into any size (barring micro/cosmic).
>>2657299
Big enough to be undeniably dominant, small enough grab people and easily interact with them? Certainly a high contender for best size!
>>2657302
>>2657305
>>2657304
Pretty much.
>>2657308
>>2657315
>>2657318
>>2657323
>>2657325
>>2657328
>>2657335
>>2657337
>>2657344
>>2657329
It's fetish- FETISH SHIT
>>2657147
Just finished this relatively quick collage using this pic.
>>2657374
It's a shame that she's famous for nothing really. If she was just some normal civilian, she might have done porn (I'm talking like legit studio porn, not the sextape), and it would be amazing. God damn, this retarded cunt is so hot.
>>2657411
A lot of the time, I feel like this "unwarranted fame" type personality lends itself well to giantess scenarios.
>>2657421
it does. I can fantasize that she's spoiled, haughty, bitchy, etc. all perfect traits for a Goddess
>>2657428
>>2657429
although I love the word 'Goddess' autists in the fetish have definitely made it more ridiculous to use.
>>2657430
>>2657374
Fucking legend, m8!
>>2657411
This is why I love her giga sized. Garbage human being but all of a sudden she's a mile or two huge and everything just makes sense
>>2657431
just kind of posting randomly. Who else has gigs of stuff and doesn't sortit?
Giantess only, although I have a bunch of nice shrink stuff too.
>>2657433
>>2657433
Got about 300+ pictures that I weed out hard time to time because so much stuff looks better by comparison. I had them in order from shortest giant woman to biggest giant woman but somehow everything got renamed and the sorting got ruined.
Posting randomly.
>>2657428
>>2657421
Also all of this it true.
>>2657434
Last one of Agnetis I got that is decent
>>2657436
>>2657435
Glad we agree!
>>2657438
these shoes. I dont even have a (terrible ) heel fetish
hnnng
>>2657439
>>2657441
>>2657442
>>2657443
>>2657444
also for what its worth im starting with older collages. a lot of videos, doubles, giantess games (included a modded wow) but my folder is 150~ gigs
>>2657445
one of my favorites
>>2657447
another favorite
>>2657451
>>2657452
>>2657453
>>2657454
>>2657455
>>2657456
>>2657457
>>2657458
>>2657459
>>2657460
>>2657463
Do you guys prefer your giantesses to be celebrities, or just random women? And if celebrities, which is your favourite to see supersized?
Do you like to imagine women you know in real life as giantesses? Any particular fantasies you have?
>>2657466
>>2657468
>>2657467
For me personally its more of a body type/image thing. I love bimboey/trophy wife type bodies. I also love teenaged giantesses. I really enjoy spoiled, bratty, and domineering giantesses. Ones that would REALLY let it go to their head.
As for people I know, the better I know them the less I might fantasize really... I see women often in passing at work/life that I don't know and I fantasize about them often.
I like the idea of one of these women having a giantess fetish worse than my own, and then by whatever method obtaining near (or actual) goddesshood, and going nuts with it.
/autism
>>2657474
>>2657475
>>2657476
>>2657477
>>2657478
>>2657480
>>2657483
>>2657486
>>2657487
>>2657459
I'm no footfag, but I really love images like this. It's all about the implied scale - she's *so huge* that even her foot by itself is unimaginably colossal.
>>2657488
>>2657490
>>2657489
>>2657491
>>2657492
>>2657494
>>2657495
>>2657496
>>2657489
another (ill try to find more on my second go through)
>>2657497
>>2657499
>>2657502
there was an old story about cheerleaders shrinking football players in the shower and crushing them at then at the very end they use the method n themselves in the reverse to grow, and its implied they destroy most of the city.
this always reminds me of it
>>2657503
>>2657504
>>2657505
another favorite
>>2657506
>>2657509
>>2657511
>>2657514
>>2657515
>>2657516
>>2657517
>>2657518
>>2657519
>>2657520
>>2657521
Anyone want to throw out some more collage suggestions? I should have a bit of free time this week, still willing to work on a pic or two.
>>2657522
>>2657523
do you have an email or way to get in touch? I'vebeen collecting mats to make collages myself, just havent had the time lately. Maybe you can do something with them?
>>2657524
>>2657525
>>2657526
>>2657467
I prefer known people, unless the source image used of a random person is really REALLY good quality and they're actually in a good pose.
I really like the air-headed bimbo and the "I deserve this power I am unstoppable, etc" with a few exceptions.
Made a quick personal power rankings off the top of my head:
Kim Kardashian- epitome of "I am your god now desu"
Wendy Fiore- careless with huge knockers, and right comfortable with being a mile or two tall
Heidi Montag- huge airhead who might not even notice she's massive
Charlotte McKinney- same as above, airhead with a huge pair, just discovered her two months ago
Agnetis Miracle- calm, massive, force of nature (speficially those meteors on her chest), no real personality to speak of, could be unaware
Sara Underwood- hot, criminally underused as I said before
Taylor Swift- power trip
Jordan Carver- take a guess, a lot of images done of her, but only a dozen GOOD ones
Jana Defi- nice figure, good unaware material, underused
Karlie Kloss- same as Taylor Swift
Iga Wyrwal- think I've only seen 2 images ever
Ewa Sonnet- only seen one decent morph ever
Kate Beckinsale- calm power trip, hard to describe
Anna Kendrick- I don't even know why, but I like her big
Paris Hilton- used to be a lot higher, but she's basically irrelevant now
Denise Milani- love her, but arguably overdone
/autism
Also I used to like Hayley Williams, but I really can't roll with all the tats. Just a personal preference. Work is fantastic though.
>>2657527
>>2657529
>>2657528
are you me?
id love to chat, if you're not totally creeped out by it.
>>2657531
>>2657533
>>2657534
>>2657535
>>2657537
>>2657523
Any content is good content m8. But if you wanna work on something with maybe someone you don't see too often being huge and able to flick away skyscrapers with a single finger...yeah that's smiled upon also.
>>2657538
>>2657524
Can you throw them together into a folder on mega.co.nz or something similar? There might be a few folks here who might work on suggestions, so that could be more useful.
I wonder if there is any good website that might allow a bunch of different people to upload potential collage material?
>>2657528
Nice list!
>>2657540
>>2657541
can't now, but I will try later today
>>2657544
>>2657531
I am you. If you notice brief moments of lost time, that's actually me taking over.
I try to keep kind of to myself until one of these threads comes along, but I have a deviantart account (CADecepticon). Nothing on it. Mostly just for telling people how much I appreciate their work.
Funny though, I literally tell friends "oh you'd think so much less of me if you saw the sick shit I was into" and they laugh. Kind of embellishing, but yeah.
>go to post image
>TOO LARGE!!
>go to choose another
>lose place
Joey Fisher btw. Only one I've ever seen of her.
>>2657545
>>2657547
>tfw you pretend its Kim K wearing the shoes
>>2657541
>I wonder if there is any good website that might allow a bunch of different people to upload potential collage material?
GoogleDocs for Giant Women. Get on it, internet!
I should make my own image suggestions folder.
Actually, this is a good time to ask. I lost my entire folder and have building it back up for months, but I can't find a certain image.
It's a Victoria's Secret catalog (I think) promo of Alessandra Ambrossio kind of laying down on the right, Adrianna Lima in the middle, and a third (don't know who) on the left. They're all bunched together in the middle of a city. They are massive with fingernails about the size of a skyscraper. Extremely well done image. Can't remember who it was by or where I found it, but I can't find it now. Will look for the source image for better reference.
>>2657548
alright thats it from me. I'll end with a shrink image. I hope some of you found something new or stuff you remembered. I'll be back.
>>2657546
Messaged you on deviantart, I'm notch.
>in b4 minecraft joke
Found the source
>>2657552
>>2657552
>>2657554
It looks familiar, but I don't know where to find the pic. Simple relevant search terms on the most obvious websites aren't bringing it up either. Will keep my eye out for it though!
>>2657553
Epic dump, anon! I wasn't sure there'd be much life in the revived /hr/ giantess threads ... you're certainly proving otherwise!
>>2657549
Seriously though, this would be a great resource for me. I like the idea of working on requests/suggestions, but whenever I ask, I mostly just get fairly vague answers, or low quality images that don't really lend themselves well to collaging. I love the idea of just having a communal grab-bag website where everyone can just throw in whatever images they want so I can just jump in and select something that looks fun.
Does anyone know of such a website? Ideally something that the average anon wouldn't need to register for, they could just drop whatever images they want in?
>>2657564
>i made a shrink pic too recentlybut its too small to post here. Maybe I should stick to that :P
Hey, it's /hr/, but we mostly just have (or had, this is the first giantess thread here in quite a while!) these threads on this board because none others are a very good fit. Feel free to post your pic on some other website and link it here. Always nice to see stuff made by fellow anons! :)
>>2657568
alright. its simple, but i think the vast majority of shrink pics are.
http://imgur.com/Ah2YXNx
>>2657573
Cute girls, nice size of the shrinkee! Not bad! :)
>>2657467
I guess I don't have a preference, but celebs have that "larger than life" aspect going for them and generally have better HR material to work with. Emma Stone, Mary Elizabeth Winstead and Lauren Cohen always make out to be colossal cuties in my book. I would love to see someone make Lizzy Caplan into a giantess though.
As for people I know in real life, if I've masturbated to them more likely than not they're a giantess. Or rather I'm shrunken down (a few inches tall ideally), but as long as they're of a much larger stature I'm a happy camper. Typically it's a gradual shrinking situation, sometimes linked to arousal and sometimes not controlled by them (in which case they are taken aback before inevitably being turned on by the situation). Ejaculation making the effect permanent is often a facet to the fantasy. If I don't end up living as a shrunken pet/slave then being sat on/stepped on is a dream come true. Lately I've been having fantasies of one of my friends after watching her crush a bug when she was wearing boots, calling the experience "exciting".
/autism
>>2657549
I like that idea, I've got absolutely no talent, and don't like to pester the people who do. So the ability to just dump the photos I think might work in case somebody picks them up would be good.
>>2657832
/hr/ is getting weirder every day.
>>2658160
I'm totally on board, I think it would be a fun way to select new collage material to use.
But I can't think of any good website/service. I mean, there are plenty of non-ideal options - eg. we could create a custom sub-reddit and just throw up imgur links under a throwaway username ... but that requires too much faffing about (similarly with deviantart/flickr/facebook groups, etc).
There seems to be a few free websites which offer collaborative, anonymous photosharing ... but I can't find any that aren't super limited without upgrading to a paid account. For testing purposes, I created an album at Yogile. It's limited to 100MB and 15 days, but maybe we'll get a feel for how this sort of thing might work? Here's the URL:
https://www.yogile.com/yi7gadt9
Just click the "+ Add More Photos" button in the upper right. It might bring up a sign up message, but you can just ignore it and upload anonymously.
If anyone knows a better alternative, please let us know.
Can someone dona collage with either of these two pictures?
>>2658261
Sorry I meant *do a collage
>>2658261
I'm not against it, but they're not super ideal images for collaging simply because they're cut off at the waist/legs like that. They could easily be put into a scene among the rooftops of some buildings, but they'd look a bit more integrated if you could see the full body and where she connects with the ground, her shadow sprawling out on the landscape next to her, and so forth.
If you have some other images of this woman to choose from that might work better, maybe post them up too? Otherwise I can still take a whack at a collage using one of those pics ... the issue is that it might just look like a super simple cut+paste job.
Im new to GIMP and made this. I still have to watch some more videos.
>>2658271
Thanks for sharing! Always great to see new folks jumping in to learn how to make collages. Nice choice of woman too! :)
I guess the first suggestion I might offer is to work on techniques for cropping the woman out of her image. If it helps, I started working on a collaging tutorial for GIMP a few years ago ... I never finished it, but I did at least cover how I go about cutting images out. It's not the only way to do it, and it's not the best ways (using Layer Masks is a lot better!), but maybe it will be useful:
http://docopsizeblog.blogspot.com.au/p/docops-tutorial-work-in-progress.html
Looking forward to seeing more of your stuff!
>>2658275
GIMP has a "Foreground Select" tool these days that might help refine the edge a bit easier than the lasso tool.
https://docs.gimp.org/en/gimp-tool-foreground-select.html
Love your work!
>>2658270
How's that?
So uh where do these girls poop?
>>2658303
That's a bit more the kind of image I prefer to work with. The quality/resolution wasn't the greatest, but I had a quick go at using it in a collage. I hope it's OK!
>>2658358
W-Where ever they like, I guess! :P
>>2658253
Some of the entries here are already looking pretty nice! Just bumping the link here, feel free to throw in whatever you guys want!
https://www.yogile.com/yi7gadt9
>>2658361
Put a few on there. Don't know how SFW or NSFW we can get so I tried to keep it PG-13. Looks like you can't preview images in full size because what I loaded up are pretty high rez.
>>2658410
They look good! I've already got those pics of Charlotte McKinney in the blue/white bikini in my folder, so I'll have to double my efforts to look for a nice background to integrate her into. Already got something in mind for one of the other pics you posted too.
I'd say there's no reason to keep the folder PG-13, this is a red board, I don't think any of us will mind.
>>2658425
Sounds good. I'll see what else I can do. Most of what I have are posed photoshoots, so I'm trying to look for things such as not looking directly at the camera or weird lighting. Went through a few threads on /hr/ but most of them are brand new with the old ones already bumped off the board. Might dip into /s/ as well.
Now this one...one of my favorites. Love the scale. Absolutely invincible, nothing can be done to even slow her down for a millisecond. The problem you sometimes get with these super-mega sized ones is that it can end up looking too obviously photoshoped where the ground meets the feet.
I'm also a sucker for high resolution anything so I can see the details and try to gauge her height. I think I may only have one or two saved images that are bigger than her.
>>2658431
Bigger as in more giant-er
I don't know if this is welcomed or allowed here, but can someone collage this?
>>2658437
Fuck off and die.
>>2658361
I up loaded a fair few
Sorry if there is too many
I also uploaded some of my guilty fetish niche with in the giantess community
<3
>>2658431
>>2658432
This sort of scale has really /grown/ (heh) on me over the last year or so. Alt and Megalover have really produced some cracking images of this type.
On this note, what is everyone's favourite giantess sizes?
>>2658437
Honestly, I'm not horribly opposed to working on material like this ... but at the same time, it's not really up my alley, so it's probably not the sort of thing I'd work on ahead of a lot of the material already posted. Sorry, it's just not really my kind of thing. :-\
>>2658454
Lookin' good! Some fun stuff in there!
>>2658467
>On this note, what is everyone's favourite giantess sizes?
Just about pic related maybe a little bigger, using the Burj Khalifa as a measuring stick. Big enough to be just over the requirements for unstoppable, but still able to pick out automobiles individually.
Smallest I like is about when the average skyscraper is about belly high, and the biggest I'll go is to the point where they can barely still pick out individual skyscrapers with their fingernails, maybe x2 or so of what you just posted.
I'll save whatever is in good quality, though, provided the model is good. Except for once you have 1/8 planet sized or bigger. It just becomes a photo of a model with a blue ball next to them. I loathe those images.
>>2657188
I've been using GIMP for years, but sadly I'm in a hurry. So I'll make this quick and useful.
Rather than erasing or cutting out a person, try using images with solid backgrounds (white or black are preferable), and then changing the layer mode (a drop down bot on the top right) to one that works best at the edges of said person (Lighten, Screen, Multiply, Overlay, etc, will be the most likely ones to work).
Once you've got the edges sorted, duplicate that layer, switch it back to a normal layer, and erase the edges again (you can use a larger brush as you already have an edge underneath, and that edge may be slightly lighter/darker than the normal layer you are erasing).
There's a lot more to it than that of course, but this is a good starting point to experiment from.
NOTE: I advise using the "Levels Tool" (the icon looks like a graph, but may only be in the menu above if not set as visible).
It will let you lighten and darken the highlights, midtones and shadows individually, which is very useful and much more powerful than a silly "brightness & contrast" slider.
Here's a screenshot with the two mentioned controls in red boxes:
>That feel when you edit a screenshot of the thing you are editing the screenshot with...
>>2658467
<3
Analternateusername or docop?
Also I miss Jazmini
She was a great model, dem tits, dat attitude, that style, that Canadian accent
>>2657083
Love the composition of this one, nice details with the car
>>2658467
>On this note, what is everyone's favourite giantess sizes?
I've been sperging about my preferences throughout this thread so I'll keep it simple. I like anything from amazonian to skyscraper-size as far as GTS collages go. A lot of mega stuff is good too if it's done right. I just love giant women.
>>2658361
I posted a couple in there last night, will add a few more in a bit. I like how it's turned out so far though. If this can be a consistent thing I can see good things coming out of it (we've got a couple folks known for their collages invested in this thread at least). Is there any interest in webm work? The short collage animations AnAlternateUsername makes are just superb and do a better job conveying size than green screen videos. Granted I know they take a while to make, I've gathered as much trying to learn video editing software. I think they are worth it though and would be very interested if anyone had good source material to work with.
>>2656953
The fact that you can use that for just about any human behavior makes it a pretty meaningless statement. It's kind of like saying "physics." Yeah you're right but it doesn't tell me anything.
>>2658612
its hard to nail down
i think at its core its along the veins of humilation/femdom/self-esteem issues that result in the idealization of powerful women, and taken to its extreme produce giant ones.
also dumpfag here will post more either later tonight or tomorrow
>>2658612
I like the idea that a giantess is unquestionably dominant but doesn't necessarily have a dom mentality. Regardless of her intentions her actions have catastrophic consequences. But of course there are many variations/nuances to the idea (like most other fetishes).
>>2658638
Great, looking forward to it.
>>2658612
I think this is pretty true.
My experience is that there seems to be a whole array of different reasons why people like the fetish. It seems to be more like a common "destination" for a whole bunch of different "paths" ... if that makes sense.
For some people, it's just an extreme form of power play. Even here there's a wide range of preferences - some people prefer a woman who will collect them and use them at their whim as a personal sex toy; others prefer women who will outright crush/kill them; others still prefer a woman who will simply drop them in their panties and promptly forget about them; and so on.
For some people, it's all about the process of the woman's growth. I guess you could see this as watching her "grow" in power, but it's usually a bit more specific than that. The growth process is frequently portrayed as being orgasmic (or otherwise enjoyable) to the woman; there's an element of voyeurism and exhibitionism as her clothes tear away from her body.
For some people, it's just about being an amplified version of something you already like. If you're into feet, there might be something appealing about a foot so large you could climb over it. Or a foot that literally dominates the landscape/city. Same thing with other body parts - and heck, women themselves. If there's a celebrity you like and "idolize", you can further imagine her as some world-ending goddess or some such.
For others still, it's just about the spectacle. You like all those neat, visually stimulating destruction scenes in Hollywood movies? Now imagine them being caused by something sexy. Stimulation overload.
If you're into cutesy scenarios, a giantess can be totally loving and affectionate and look after you like nobody else can. If you're into S&M scenarios, a giantess can be as sadistic as you want. There's just so much variety.
>>2659054
JR is one of those collagers who manages to really ride the realism line. He really knows how to pick matching source material.
I wish he hadn't stopped making regular collages!
>>2658585
>Is there any interest in webm work? The short collage animations AnAlternateUsername makes are just superb and do a better job conveying size than green screen videos. Granted I know they take a while to make, I've gathered as much trying to learn video editing software. I think they are worth it though and would be very interested if anyone had good source material to work with.
I'm certainly interested in doing more animated collages. But what you said is true, they're much more of a pain, especially if they require a lot of manual rotoscoping.
I've made a bunch of rotoscoped SW animations over the last 6 months or so, but very few with giantesses in mind (webm related, a Taylor Swift animation I did a few months back). I've just found it to be much harder to find good, loopable material for a giantess pose/action ... or, at least, one that doesn't require days/weeks to rotoscope.
If anyone thinks they have some good video material that might make a good loop ... let me know!
>>2659072
>tfw no giantess Taytay to kick the shit out of my balls until they're drained
Kill me.
>>2659072
First off, this is amazing. I love the sense of scale. Really, wow. As far as rotoscoping goes I've learned the gist of it but never made any size content with it. Any advice for someone who may want to? I can try to find some footage on youtube, though I wouldn't know where to start for background material.
>>2658904
>If you're into feet, there might be something appealing about a foot so large you could climb over it.
Yep
I've always preferred more "realistic" sizes, where they're still small enough to have interactions that aren't just pure destruction. Trying to find source images though is a pain (Not like I could make them into anything though). I can find a good picture of a person, but then never find any background images with the right perspective/lighting, it seems my dreams of a 12m tall Hayley Atwell will go unfulfilled.
>>2659103
I think the best advice I can give is to try to find something with a solid background. For example, the background in the Taylor Swift clip I used was mostly completely black above her butt, so I only had to rotoscope around her legs (and a little bit here and there around her head/upper body as there were some stray lights around). It worked well to stick her on a black background because of this. But if you get a nice solid background, you could also try to use some chroma keying.
Simpler is key, really.
It's kind of annoying, because a really simple way to achieve *great* results would be to film a woman from a low angle, so she's set completely against the blue sky. In that case, you don't even need to roto her at all (so long as you don't get any pesky trees or such in the shot), you can just superimpose images of buildings in the foreground. Unfortunately, there's very little celebrity content like this available. :P But I guess it's a nice idea if you're got a gf/wife you might let you film her for some private size content.
>>2659162
Yeah, more convincing person-to-person interaction material is harder to come by. I've always found it difficult to find good SW material for collages, I suspect it's for similar reasons.
12m tall Hayley Atwell sounds like fun though. She's certainly a cutie who hasn't been collaged enough! If you've got a few favourite shots of her, why not throw them into the yogile pile? I'll try to keep your request/preferred size in mind. ;)
https://www.yogile.com/yi7gadt9
>>2658476
>tfw your picture gets posted
noice
I've made a few similar. Someone uploaded them to giantessbooru under tag "Kong_Major" (my nickname from gtscity).
>>2659271
I just checked out your stuff - you've done some neat collages! You've certainly got a good eye for nice giantess selection! :)
>>2659240
Thanks for the advice. As for the background, did you use a static image? I haven't had much luck in finding a good background that isn't marred by shaky camera work or something of the sort.
But I'd still like to give the process a try! If anything good comes out of it then there's more material for the community, where webms are a bit scarce.
In the mean time, I can find footage and cut it down to loop-length. You got an email/preferred method I could send some clips?
>>2659240
Thanks! I've thrown up a couple that aren't just her looking directly at a camera and smiling, not sure how well any of them could work though.
>>2657467
Celebrities, because I love celebs in general. Favorite is Taylor Swift
>>2659472
to be fair, Tay tay is kinda in a godly league of her own
>>2659330
>As for the background, did you use a static image?
Yeah, the background is just a static image. I try to throw some camera shake on top of the final composition to make it look a little more realistic, and hide the fact that it's static. Though in principle you could also try to do some motion tracking to help integrate another layer onto a shaky background.
>But I'd still like to give the process a try! If anything good comes out of it then there's more material for the community, where webms are a bit scarce.
I'd say give it a go! At the very least, trying these things out for yourself gives you a really good idea of which parts of the process are easy/quick, and which parts are hard/annoying. Helps you refine your idea of what good material to use looks like. :)
>In the mean time, I can find footage and cut it down to loop-length. You got an email/preferred method I could send some clips?
Sure, you can send anything you like to my email address: docop_pocod at yahoo dot com
>>2659465
Nice! Will have a go at using one of them at some point. :)
>>2659472
>>2659481
Taylor *is* basically already a giantess. I remember I once saw an article that described her and Karlie Kloss as "skyscraper best friends". They're not wrong! :P
>>2659564
>I remember I once saw an article that described her and Karlie Kloss as "skyscraper best friends"
Like this?
Had to scale the rez down so I could actually post it.
>>2659590
Heh, well the article was just some random celebrity gossip thing, it was just a cute turn of phrase.
That sort of scale suits them both just fine though. ;-P
>>2659564
Very cool. I found some photoshoot videos with solid backgrounds, about to go through them and see what's usable (I'll try not to spam your inbox). I'm hoping I can make some good OC, but if not then I imagine having keyed footage would be helpful for those more skilled than I.
>>2659679
>you will never be crushed under TayTay's gigantic bum or feet
jdimsa
>>2659683
Feel free to spam away! My email box doesn't get much traffic anyway, I don't mind looking through a bunch of potential material. :)
>>2659684
I know that feel too, bro. ;-;
>>2659684
Feels bad, man.
Can someone do a collage using this Uma Thurman pic? Haven't seen any giantess stuff of her around.
>>2659735
She'd certainly make a neat giantess!
However, that image isn't really the most friendly to work with. It's a bit grainy overall, and the lighting isn't too natural (doesn't lend itself too well to outdoors scenes), and is overblown in parts. The cigarette smoke might be a bit fiddly, though I don't think it's too much of a problem. And the fact that she's propping herself up on soft blankets makes it a bit more tricky too, given that parts of her body are obscured as she's sunk into them.
Not total roadblocks, but they make it more fiddly that typical. I'll keep this one in mind, but no promises!
I don't get these threads and pictures.
Is it supposed to be funny, or is it like a fetish or something?
>>2659774
It's a fetish. So for most people looking in from the outside, it's not going to make a lick of sense. :P
If you're curious, there were a few comments earlier in the thread trying to explain parts of it:
>>2656737
>>2656953
>>2658612
>>2658638
>>2658904
>>2659784
>>2659785
>>2658904
>a giantess can be totally loving and affectionate and look after you like nobody else can.
I don't have this fetish for giantesses but this part I greentexted is what I think about -and like- when I scroll through this thread.
>>2659788
Today will be a dump day for me, it looks like.
Give me a few hours.
We might hit the image limit.
>>2659784
>Tfw hometown
I guess it just fit the perspective you needed, but a brisfag's gotta represent
>>2659774
I find it funny. Also looking for wallpapers..
>>2659897
Another Brisfag giantess fan? Neat!
This one too: >>2657505
>>2659908
>QUT getting ass
Pure fantasy
