I recently discovered this ridiculously hot model... but I can only find censored nudes by a photographer Walter Jenkel. Anyone have them uncensored?
>>1245059
>>1245061
>>1245063
>>1245064
>>1245066
>>1245068
>>1245069
>>1245070
>>1245071
>>1245074
>>1245075
>>1245079
>>1245081
>>1245068
Did jenkel publish them? Havent seen him this nude, I guess no uncensored ones? Seems like they might be behind a paywall or else why bother
guessing the censored versions are the one that the photographer published to the web. it depends on the photographer's endgoal, but he might be waiting to publish them in a photo book. although an erotic paywall site would be much better.
This is disgusting and disturbing. He looks as young as my nieghbour's son and his friends. Did he even realise what he "agreed" on doing? Did he know these sort of photographs can easily ruin his future and haunt him forever? This is sad. Nothing about this can be called artsy at all. Plain cheap and pornographic. Unless he's a porn actor wannabe, this stuff won't help him at all. Only predatory photographers would be interested in using him (literally) for their sex fantasies masked as "creative arts". Wake up, chico. Hire a new agent or look carefully who is around you and with who you are working with. Ay santa Maria...
>>1245238
>>1245249
No one is baiting, you sickfuck. I'm serious.
>>1245267
If you cared about this, even remotely, you would not be here wanking it on /hm/. Stop being such a huge predator. Think of the naive adult men who can't be held responsible for themselves!
>>1245273
Don't tryna get all sassy and "witty" with me. You are nothing more than a pathetic degenerate faggot. Because of sickfucks such as yourself why straight people can't look at gays with respect. I am gay but I am nothing like you.
>>1245267
>>1245285
still no nudes, but his bulge is tasty af
>>1245285
>Ay santa Maria...
For the love of god, someone please find the uncensored versions of these.
>>1245173
yeah, they're on walterjenkel.tumblr
honestly, I don't care if they're behind a paywall, I'd be willing to pay if I could see where.
>>1245618
>walterjenkel.tumblr
What are those photos even about? Is it just some perv taking nude pictures of young men and calling it art?
>>1245670
Yes but do we care?
Only question is why he doesn't even offer the nude ones for money
>>1245068
his body hair gets me so hard
>>1245670
I guess... is that really an issue on a board filled with porn?
>>1245670
meh i mean besides the boners a lot of these photos are objectively well done and would be right at home in a fashion editorial ad, especially photos like >>1245064
i've seen a lot more shitty photos by pervy photographers (RE: modelmayhem) who are interested in taking advantage of wannabe models above all else. at least these are OK and vibe with fashion photo aesthetic, which FYI isn't necessarily trying to be fine art photo aka "ART"
anyway this is a porn board why am i talking about any of this lol. if i want to hear misinformed lunkheads talk about "what true art is" i can just get on reddit
most of the time these pervy photographers try and solicit these "models" into doing something behind the scenes....even with these boner shots...there's a good chance these photographers tried to be the ones who fluffed their models...when their models are fully capable of jerking off
>>1246078
Sadist sick faggot! Spare us all your "opinions" about fashionable craps. Sickfucks like you only care to fap to such photos because it's the closest y'all can ever get to see real straight men being degenerated and abused sexually. Don't tryna pretend like you "see" or understand arts, pathethic.
Sickfucks should be treated like this faggot...www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2697700/Father-beats-man-bloody-puddle-walks-sexually-abusing-11-year-old-son.html
>>1246086
>>1246086
It's pretty clear that this guy understands a lot more of art than you, m8. Just calm your tits.
>>1246086
not sure if troll or weird straight guy who was sexually abused by a photographer and this incoherent rambling is therapy for you...
anyway, as >>1246118 said, i'm a photographer. fashion photography has come to develop its own aesthetic that doesn't always directly advertise products or clothing. sometimes there are fashion editorials that rely almost entirely on sexuality to sell. sex sells.
also
>assuming model is straight
if i want to see straight men degraded and abused sexually i'd go to... just literally any porn site. they're all g4p these days. anyway lol @ me taking this bait.
let's focus on finding the uncensored versions!
>>1245068
The first time I saw this on Tumblr I spent a long time on Google Image Search trying to find an uncensored version, but to no avail.
Dude is seriously hot; I need to see that cock.
Kinky photographer.
damn, there must be some uncensored somewhere...
Seriously, how does someone not have an uncensored version of these? :(
