Was Hayek a spook?
no he was a real person but he was a fucking retard
>"why is academia left wing?"
>"it's obviously nothing to properly look into they're just wrong and i'm right"
like all good bootlickers and boss' man, he hated watching prolos win the class struggle in any degree.
His theory is also based on priori pseudoscience ( the best thing I've heard from praxer is how if you try to prove them wrong, you're proving them right because you "intend" to prove them wrong) and value theory posited exclusively from the standpoint of exchange.
>>990753
Worse, an Austrian.
>>990831
This.
>>990753
What's a spook?
>>990973
Austrians are moronic from the very onset, their entire theory of value is circular. They have zero skills aside from their miraculous ability to stoke the fragile egos of the parasitic rentier.
Maybe if you stopped conceptualizing class into bullshit arbitrary tiers you'd get it right, just a thought.
>>990911
But Sigmund Freud is an Austrian.
>>990987
I'm not even sure what your point is
>>990973
>he thinks keynsian macro is wrong
You're just as bad as an Austrian tbqh. Neoclassical has better micro, but all other macro theories were basically disproven by the events of '07-'08.
>>991182
>but all other macro theories were basically disproven by the events of '07-'08
How so?
>>991207
Well it sure as shit showed that the velocity of money isn't constant, so that takes care of Monetarism. Then the end of the recession in '09 proved that fiscal policy can actually be fairly effective, which takes care of Neoclassical macro. Every other theory was heterodox trash to begin with, so I don't think they're worth listing and refuting.
>>990958
A ghost, an illuison, often a cause of restriction
