I'm writing a paper on Kant and his Critique of Pure Reason and i'm completely lost. Any good summaries out there?
>>925204
Do anglos actually say Cunt, when mentioning this guy?
>>925209
i'm sure some do. He is pretty fucking complicated and pretty much threw out all metaphysics before him
>>925204
Pure reason sucks, is what he said.
>>925209
pronounced like "can't."
>>925224
kek, but i need to write some shit on his ideality of space and time as it relates to a priori knowledge. Im lost
>>925225
dissapointed
>>925204
Bumping for when I can return later.
>>925204
>>925227
I'd be happy to explain what I can about this, but could you describe to some extent what you understand about Kant? I love his philosophy, but I don't want to unintentionally write your paper.
SEP is always a great resource. For your assignment, I think these will be the more relevant ones (though the third one is brand new and I haven't read it yet):
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant/
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-spacetime/
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-transcendental-idealism/
>>925224
More that pure reason only sucks when it's allowed to run wild.
Quick tip: remember he said that reading Hume is what woke him from his dogmatic slumber and caused him to write the critique of pure reason. Remember it's coming from that Humean perspective.
