Well considering that it's not rely a theory and more just an an opinion and statement, it's kinda pointless to judge it terms of "accuracy."

>>918148
You don't find this idea until Christianity.

Nuclear war, environmental disaster, etc.are just secular versions of thinking about how we are being punished for our sin.

>>918148
yes, but they were also often right.
We just live in one of all the possible timelines, were we just didn't anihilate ourselves yet. Seriously, we were so fucking "lucky" several times now in regard to the nuclear holocaust, that the many worlds theory becomes more likely every day

>>918164
>Seriously, we were so fucking "lucky" several times now in regard to the nuclear holocaust, that the many worlds theory becomes more likely every day
I don't think this one is actually true. There is very little motivation for a nuclear power to engange in war war of total annihilation with another nuclear power.

>>918167
mostly incidents, not decision made by the higher ups
http://www.history.com/news/history-lists/5-cold-war-close-calls

>>918184
All those incidents weren't really that close.
It would be still up to the higher ups to make the call to start a total nuclear war, which they were rather unwilling to do

>>918148
No. Hinduists thought that history is cycling and repeating itself from an era to an era.