Daily reminder that if you don't understand the philosophy of history, you'll never interpret events correctly.
Reminder that you should never read Hegel's Philosophy of History without understanding his Phenomenology first.
>>893054
"Philosophy" of History is nonsense.
>>893090
*tips fedora*
>>893092
non-argument.
>>893108
>someone posts a non-argument to a non-argument, which is followed up again by a non-argument
>>893137
No.
Your OP made a claim, you didn't provide evidence for it, I called your claim out as nonsense.
>>893137
Shut the fuck up, retard.
>>893142
I ONLY CAME HERE TO SHITPOST
>>893137
Well, philosophy of history *is* nonsense. Hegel's philosophy is self-negating.
>>893142
*tips fedora*
>>893054
I agree.
One should look for a physiognomic perspective of history.
>>893170
What does physiognomic mean?
Get sublated fggts
>>893089
>wasting time on PoS
Pathetic.
>>893266
So phenomenology?
>>893300
yes, pretty much that.
Spengler had similar influences as those of Husserl or Heidegger, and he can really be considered a proto-phenomenologist of sorts