Are we on the verge of a new Cold War?
More like its the 30s again and fascism is going to come back
>>891082
No, it's the old Cold War that hadn't finished properly.
>/his/ - Future & Humanities
>>891094
>history isn't defined by the present and thus the future
B-Bu-But the Empire never ended...
WE'RE STILL ROMANS!
WAKE UP!
>>891082
why is every post OP makes on this board a fuckin question?
We've never ending the cold war.
It's the united states vs the world
>>891100
>what is the 25 year rule
>>891102
Because the MO of historians is to ask questions.
>>891082
Read the sticky. Go talk to /pol/.
>>891113
or argument ,not leading questions
>>891115
>Le read le rules XD-face
>because history isn't about current day events
>because the cold war isn't history
>because a
>>891126
>what is the 25 year rule
Even if it's history, if it happened after 1991, it isn't up for discussion.
>>891094
>/his/ - Future & Humanities
>>891200
Politics is also not a fucking natural science, but it still goes to /pol/. Same goes for "IR".
The short answer to the OP is no. In order to have a Cold War, you need to have at least two superpowers.
>>891088
Except that's not even close to being true
>>892717
It's pretty much already happened desu.
This thread was moved to >>>/pol/68939792
