From the time I've spent here I've come to understand that many anons don't seem to truly understand a single thing about the topic resulting in many uninformed posts. It is for this reason I have taken it upon myself to start a video series for the purpose of educating wayward anons.
I'm open to any criticism and simply want more quality discussion on this board.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BpF5bZMB43E [Embed]
Philosophy = trolling + erudition
>>870958
Your pad is nice, and you seem like a decent guy, but you've got a Nu-male look about you. Grow your hair out or lose the beard, IMO.
Good job otherwise.
It's interesting that just about all of the questions you give as examples of philosophical questions would be considered as analytic, given that the philosophy discussed on this board (and /lit/) is almost always continental.
Philosophy is essentially opinion. How one sees the world. It's the purest form of meaning, that meaning which one invents for themselves.
>whether these beliefs are valid
>beliefs
>valid
LOL just LOL
genius
Perhaps you know this, but you come across as dour and smug. It's unappealing.
>>871022
Are you retarded or something.
>>871230
>Are you retarded or something.
>something.
>.
LOL just LOL.
Do you know how 'valid' is used in philosophy?
>>870958
stop shilling your shitty series
kill yourself and enjoy the ban
>>871238
So what are you laughing at?
His invalid use of it?
good job
>>871248
His misuse of it. Do you know how 'valid' is used in philosophy?
>>871251
Sure, it's used in deductive logic.
Again: What are you laughing at?
>>871256
His misuse of it. Beliefs are not apt to be valid or invalid.
>>871268
nice belief bro
>>871269
Right, it's a true belief.
>>871272
kk
