Recently I was bored and wanted to watch a documentary on England. So I started watching pic related and find it to be great. I know it is trying to push a narrative of >muh anglo-saxons and >muh rule of consent but I enjoy it nevertheless.
So are there any other documentaries like this out there? Especially ones that don't trigger people with a history degree every 2 minutes. Maybe there is even an essential chart or something.
Please keep History Channel and Guido Knopp/ZDF-history tier docs out of this threat.
>>867106
>thread
Fuck me I need to go to sleep.
bumpidy
"China: A Century of Revolution" is pretty comfy
>>868192
Ah yes and it's even on PtP.
Thanks mate! Comfy is what I am looking for I guess.
Is he right about the Anglo-Saxon kingdom being the most advanced state in Europe before the n̶o̶r̶m̶i̶e̶s̶ normans ruined everything?
>>868530
He doesn't say they ruined everything but they didn't add anything to it.
>>867106
Not strictly England-related, but I've been thoroughly enjoying Kenneth Clark's Civilization series recently.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpPNbI6GcxI&list=PLt3Pke412qVciCdn0jVjBquUNS4ClEVYa
>>869602
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpPNbI6GcxI&list=PLt3Pke412qVciCdn0jVjBquUNS4ClEVYa
Yepp, that's a good one but I watched it already. Also the documentaries don't have to be England related. Sorry for the confusion.
>>867106
What is this documentary m8?
BBC's Civilisation obviously, in case you don't know it.
>>871951
lel hadn't seen the previous posts, never mind.
>look up David Starkey
>working class
>English nationalist
>Quaker
>rabidly anti-Catholic
>homosexual
This is going to be one of those "England pure strong 14/88 Anglo-Saxon Germanic, not a drop of filthy French mud blood" kind of things, isn't it.
>>871981
No it isn't and your ad hominems are weak.
>>871985
I listed his opinions and beliefs and made a guess that his documentary would probably reflect them. I don't think you know what an ad hominem is.
>>871991
>working class
>homosexual
>opinions and beliefs
>>871981
Shit with that kind of bias wouldn't even get funding or be released over here.
>>867106
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNpXwpYAahg
OP, I have to warn you, it is against the law in many countries to invoke David Starkey's name without posting this video in the same topic
>>872182
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNpXwpYAahg
Sorry I am too busy to watch a video in shit quality from some who unironically uses the term "SJW" in the title. Also I did not invoke his name.
