ITT: People who were never wrong, not even once
>>850109
Do you have that image but in an eviler saturation?
>>850125
>>850109
Of course he was never wrong, he was a Sardinian.
>>850140
Thanks
>>850143
So a gypsy?
>>850162
Are you retarded?
>>850182
No? Sardinians are gypsy shits.
>>850109
if he wasn't wrong. why is he dead? checkmate aethists
>>850191
Yes, you are apparently retarded, gypsies are originally from Northen India.
And the only shit I see here is you.
>>850109
>>850205
t. batthert Sardinian gyp
>>850216
t.Sicilian arab monkey
>leading figure in the creation of cultural marxism
>not wrong
k
>13 replies
>no Hitler
Fucking Jews.
>>850109
The TRUE hero of the Soviet Union.
My wife
>>850227
t. Suck my cock
He was wrong when he got that haircut
>>850109
What did he do exactly? If i'm not mistaken he was thrown to jail and wrote some books. What else?
>>850182
close :^) . he was half albanian
>>850712
If you're a conspiracy theorist, he's also the philosophical basis for the neoliberal, degenerate, atheist movement to take down Christianity and morality.
>>850984
>gramsci
>neoliberal
holy shit
>>850470
>>851365
Found the Jew
>>850208
Is this bait?
>>851416
trotskyite detected
>>851444
>Only Trotskyites dislike Stalin
m8, you are some kind of nutter
Has someone posted Evola yet? I'm not even a facist but his diagnoses of the failures of facist regimes is pretty brilliant.
>>851444
Get the fuck out of here, you tankie piece of shit
>>851444
Neither. I'm not a communist.
>>851444
Also checked.
>>851467
>>851521
Stalin did NOTHING wrong. Kulaks needed to be liquidated. Party cadres got dizzy with success, yes, but it was moral, just and perfectly in harmony with Marx's theory. Holodomor did not happen. It is an urban myth constructed by disaffect class traitors, the NEPmen, who lived lascivious lives in the West.
>>851502
Pinochet looked hella old
>>850984
>neoliberal
>>851610
that's erich honeker get your facts right m8
>>851642
that's winston Churchill lad
Me.
>>850109
>>850140
>>850208
>>850488
Posting in a good thread
>>850919
No he was half sardinian and half Italian with distan albanian descent on the Italian sideIl
>>851100
Literally me except less fat and no wheelchair.
>>850109
This man din du nuffin
>>850712
His jail books are golden
>>853421
Oh and he founded the communist party in Italy
>>851555
Check yourself
>>850488
>have an incredibly fast carrier in the secret service
>become head of the soviet intelligence despite not even believing in communism
>use your power to drug and rape bitches
>steal the atomic bomb from the americans
>off Stalin
>attempt to reform the Soviet Union and end the cold war
fucking Khrushchev, we could have an evil version of Gorbachev already in the 50's, averting much of the shit the cold war caused.
>>850182
sardinians are gyppozergs too senpai
>>850109
why is his hair so cool
>>850109
>>850143
This.
His knowledge and study of Sardinian language had an huge role in his poliical theory regarding languages and linguistics.
>http://www.brill.com/gramsci-and-languages
>https://networks.h-net.org/node/7651/reviews/115127/srivastava-carlucci-gramsci-and-languages-unification-diversity
>Carlucci places Gramsci’s university studies in linguistics under Matteo Bartoli as cementing Gramsci’s linkage of politics and language that came from his Sardinian origins.
>The originality of Gramsci and Languages lies mainly in its ability to recast three fundamental aspects of Gramsci’s political, intellectual and personal biography: the role of Sardinia, the influence of Italian and European historical linguistics on the development of Gramsci’s thought, as well as his encounter with Bolshevism and Lenin’s thought.
>"Developing this point further in terms of Gramsci’s attitude towards culture and philosophy, Carlucci argues that he did not see languages in hierarchical or overly deterministic ways. Gramsci’s famous dictum that “every individual is a philosopher” means that everyone has some sort of view of the world, and “at a very basic level, the expression of this implicit worldview merely consists in using a linguistic code” (p. 60). Carlucci quotes a passage by Gramsci where he says that “every social group has a ‘language’ of its own, yet one should still note that … there is a continuous adhesion and exchange between popular language and the language of the cultured classes” (quoted, p. 60). In other words, Carlucci locates Gramsci’s notion of a national language within a linguistic and philosophical continuum, characterized by a constant tension and exchange between unification and diversity.
>>850109
Andrew Jackson
Tell me one thing he was wrong about
