Were any of them decent politicians in their own right, or were they just all generic Hitler clones?
>>840406
Who is the one on the right?
>>840406
You could actually call Hitler a Mussolini clone. While not strictly accurate, he was on the scene before Hitler was.
>>840406
The third one from the right looks like a pretty generic Hitler clone desu.
mussolini predates hitler, their forerunner was maurras
>>840415
Their names from left to right are: José Antonio, Mussolini, Codreanu, Hitler, Oswald Mosley and Léon Degrelle.
>>840452
The first one's last name is Primo de Rivera. José Antonio is his first name.
>>840406
Mosely was somewhat different, he didn't believe in the fact that Brits should treat other races like slaves like Hitler did with Slavs and other "Untermenschen", saying that Britain should be too civilized for that.
>>840406
Hitler was pretty decent and was good for the German economy.
>>840511
The one prominent British facist and he's the least evil.
>>840516
To an extent I'd agree with this
If he just chilled a bit and not declare war on all his neighbors and then some, the German economy would have been amazingly well off
>>840524
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NqG2lAojNQ
Here's my source for that, a few socialists tolerate Mosley fascists for this reason and because he's basically as commie as a fascist can get
>>840549
Agreed. Though, I'd argue his biggest failure was wasting resources & manpower slaughtering Gypsies, Jews and Slavs when he could've used it to help the war effort. Even if you think they deserved it for some reason, yoi can't deny that it's just stupid.
>>840406
Mussolini predated Hitler.
The Iron Guard was heavily infused with Romanian Orthodoxy.
Mosley supported a united Europe.
Rexism was distinctly Catholic.
If instead of genociding the USSR, Hitler had played up White movement anti-Soviet propaganda and recruited Ukrainians into special divisions as well as doing the same with Poles etc, would Germany have had a better chance?
Mosley pretty much as the black sheep of European fascism, and in every circle he was involved with.
An aristocrat turned socialist and champion of the people, who only abandoned his ofifce in the socialist govemrnet because he felt they weren't socialist enough; failing to be active in governing and combatting unemployment in Britain.
Many of his policies advocated workers controlling 50% of above stakes in any larger established business to allow then to have a say in the running, state ownership of many key industries, but still protecting the right of private enterprise for the masses.
The most democratic of the bunch too, wished to reform the system rather than destroy it, believed in a system rather than voting bases on geography voters would vote based on profession seeing it as worth more than just living near, following the lines of the Liberal thinker John Stuart Mill that while in power the government should be able to do as if wishes within reason without disruption, but the public should be allowed to vote out the fascist govemrent if it loses the support of the peoples.
Mosley had a strong pacifist streak too, totally opposed to any war other than in defence of the British Empire if attacked, and even argued he'd support disarmament if Multilateral, far cry from the militarism of others
I always felt 'Europe a narion' was overstated, it was means to an end more than anything, all Mosley really called for was a common foreign policy intentionally to act as a first force against Communism of the USSR and Capitalism of the USA, not to mention by 1945 Mosley was in some respects going off the deep end, it's purpose was that Mosley could no longer use the British Empire as his example, previously Mosley expressed the British Empire should be it's self contained economic trading block, bettering the UK and also giving the colonies more govemrent regionally themselves
Privately remarked he wasn't so fond of Hitler too, preferred Bennyto
>>840418
Mussolini was worse than Hitler in terms of politics.
>>840556
He sounds like a drunk man ranting in some parking lot alone.
>>840883
Not him, but to be fair, by that point he was an old man with Parkinsons ranting to his few remaining supporters after being demonised due to his arrest during the war, the other more traditional Fascists loved to buly him as a former Socialist and moderate with Arnold Leese of the Imperial Fascist League calling Mosley a "kosher fascist"
There were some classic speeches recorded though
1931
https://youtu.be/g_SepgAf4rE
1933
https://youtu.be/8YfF13W-6Yc
and the often posted 1967 interview
https://youtu.be/rd7LcaXZzUs
>>840406
That chart is still missing the Norwegian Nationalist party.
>>840454
Also Mussolini didn't really care about the Jews all that much. That is what Hitler and Fascism are forever linked with.
>>840406
Besides the swastika, all those logos are shit.
>>841846
British fascists are an awesome
>>840406
How much do you think the other fascists made fun of how bad Rexist logo was behind Degrelle's back?
>>840406
I don't know very much about each other, but I will tell you about the two I know.
Cornelius Zelea Codreanu has normal moral rules, and hasn't spawned house hatred towards Slavs without any sense as Hitler did. The Jews were a huge problem in Romania back in the day, and especially in his region, Moldova. They would own huge estates on which ethnic Romanians were treated as second class citizens, usually working alongside gypsies in blue collar jobs, farriers, swots but especially thralls. Famine was not a rare sighting amongst those thralls.
But Codreanu also wanted a greater Romania, but the royalty has hindered the rightist movement, selling us to the enemies: Russians. He was lynched at the command of Carol II.
Mussolini did not want a pure Italian race, but he craved for a mighty Italy, such as the Roman empire, and we can see this from his will to invade the Balkans (Hellenics, Illyrians and Thracians). But he lacked a good army.
