what is the best news site? i asked earlier for one that was unbiased,unopinionated and free of private interest, and was told thats not a thing. so are there any that are at least better than the rest or am i supposed to just keep reading 20 articles for each news story? because thats retarded. is there an aggregator or something that will just give me headlines with links to various articles? are rss feeds still a thing?
>>678039
i don't trust 4chan for my news. if you're suggesting i ask on there, i don't want too i want to know what other countries do for news. its /int/ related.
>>678031
the one with a relatively unbiased & uninfluenced reporter currently embedded in the region & situation you are trying to appraise youself of
so, depends?
christian science monitor used to be pretty good, I'm not sure they have the cash to stay where they need to be though.
probably twitter, but only if they stopped monetizing & promoting posts.
>>678031
Bloggers are probably the best place to get your information from.
No news outlet can ever truly be considered 'unbiased', every news outlet will show some kind of bias one way or the other.
Live streamers are probably the freest of private interest but they tend to fall into either a liberal or conservative bias and they aren't exactly a reliable news source for up to the minute updates. Some just like to generate controversy to get views and rake in more of that Youtube revenue.
Here's a list of what are probably the better news sources.
Pete Santili
https://www.youtube.com/user/PeterSantilliTV
Thom Hartman program
https://www.youtube.com/user/thomhartmann
RT (>in b4 Putin)
Vice (hipster Jews)
Euronews (Eurozone propaganda)
Less good
Democracy Now (extremely liberal bias)
Deutsche Welle
You probably know by now to avoid all the macro commercial crap like FOX, CNN and anything owned by NBC Universal.
Watch Alex Jones only if you feel like having a good laugh.
What is it with sexual pictures in the OPs? They piss me off so much
>>679023
Are you muslim?
>>679026
It doesn't matter. They're distracting for a thread that's supposed to have at least half intelligent discourse.
>>679030
pretty sure it's to attract attention lad
>>679023
low test
SYRIA GENERAL threads
>>679032
Who is this?