ITT: People and institutions who did nothing wrong
>Urban II
>Pinochet
>The Spanish Inquisition
>Alexander the Great
>FDR
>Napoleon Bonaparte
>Hegel
FDR did, though.
>inb4 /pol/ fags justifying the Third Reich
>>580008
Literally never did a morally wrong thing.
Joseph Stalin
>>580336
Hitler
>>580358
Yes
>>580008
>Stalin
>Robespierre
>>580325
This. Can't decide who was worse. Him or Wilson.
>>580008
> Pinochet was a nice guy and a competent leader
What's up with this fucking meme ?
>>581736
It's a reaction to the leftist "I <3 Stalin" faggotry that's popped up in the past few years on 4chan
>>581898
>>582650
>tfw on Soviet 4chan in a parallel universe where the USSR won the cold war, this is the last image you see before you get b& and sent to the nearest gulag
>>580008
>Lenin
>Vlad Tepes
Woodrow Wilson.
FDR.
Obama.
>>581736
He dismantled an entire Bolshevik revolutionary apparatus by killing only 3.000 people, did political reforms that led his country towards a path of development and, unlike every most other dictators, stepped down once the people said they didn't want him anymore.
Today Chile is Latin America's most prosperous country.
>>583029
Allende was elected though, he hadn't come to power by revolution, whatever you think of his politics.
>>583029
The Uruguayans actually did a better job.
They only killed like 200 people.
>>583055
He was using his Presidency to give funds and weapons to revolutionary guerrillas trained in Cuba.
>>583069
A god tier ruler would have answered the Chilean Senate's call to unseat Allende, and then returned power to civilian leaders when he was done.
Not a lot of people can be Cincinatus.
>>583076
Agreed, that's why I wouldn't say that Pinochet "did nothing wrong", he should just have deposed Allende.
He was still a competent leader, though, if only because he delegated the job to people like Jaime Guzman that actually knew what to do.
>>583069
A lot of democratically elected leaders have given funds to dodgy foreign sources. I wasn't aware that was justification for setting up your own military dictatorship, especially using the aid of a foreign power yourself.
>>583120
Well, Pinochet rose to power because the Chilean Senate had passed a resolution asking for the military to remove Allende from power, citing illegal land seizures by Allende's political allies, and Allende ruling by decree rather than through democratic institutions.
Griffith
Sulla was perfect
>>583132
You mean he rose to power via a US sponsored coup using political differences as justification.
>>583266
>If Chomsky said it it's true!
Luther
>>583144
if he was perfect then where's his nose
>>583273
Pathetic. Chomsky's an idiot when it comes to Western foreign policy.
The US involving itself in Chilean politics and sponsoring the coup Pinochet copu is a confirmed fact.
It was pretty much standard at the time for US foreign policy.
Hegel
Philip II
>>583069
Kek'd, if giving weapons to guerillas was enough to be deposed, every fucking US president would be.
>>583029
Yeah, fucking brilliant.
If that's your definition of competent, I hope you aren't in charge of recruiting anybody for any job.
>>583132
'Cause Chilean Senate was so democratic in the first place.
>>583324
Thanks Chicago boys ! Did so much good for the planet !
>>581898
>leftist
no, just reactionary.
>>586163
Do you seriously think these are the kinds of things people write on their cv's? I for one never mention my dictatorships to future employers.
>>586188
What do you do if they suspect anything ?
Personnally I offer them tickets for a trip to Eastern Europe.
In a french train.
