Did plutarch just not try hard enough?
Wot??
we wuz feelosopherz n shyt
>>567139
Plutarch was a historian nshit
His Life of Alexander is uninteresting
>>567154
I'd sooner call him a novelist than an historian.
>>567446
>He had very very good sources compared to what we have nowadays.
And yet he was so inaccurate, hence the OP
>>567478
He wasn't extremely inaccurate. Of course most of the anecdotes wouldn't be true (he was a virtueist first, not a historian) and of course the battle numbers weren't true (everyone made the numbers bigger back in those days)