Post battles where your country was outnumbered and won
>>548512
Did you shitpost them to death?
>>548487
It was just a prank (bro)
get fucked yanks
I'm Israeli so all of them.
>>550573
>5000 people
>19 casualties
>""""""""""""battle"""""""""""
Why do Americans insist on romanticising minor skirmishes? oy vey it's like lexington and concord all over again
>>548487
one of many
>>550592
>"19 Casualties"
Can you read?
>>550682
Bong here, casualties generally doesn't include the wounded in our usage
>>550684
oh that's actually a lot more straightforward than our use of the word.
>>550701
In the American Civil War there were less than ten battle where over 1000 people perished.
That was a huge part on our outlook for WW1
We were afraid to get involved during the build up of it, because we saw how big battles got during the Napoleonic wars.
>>550715
Ausfag here, I always assumed casualties meant the how many people were 'taken out of the fight' so to speak. Wounded/killed/missing doesn't matter.
Yeah fair enough, I don't blame the Americans for joining late. I doubt that any of the countries would have signed up to the war knowing the amount of lives they would throw away.
>>550577
Hello Israel, im Mike
Stronk
>>548487
Brits and frogs got rekt by Russians.
>>550884
It wasnt that much of a big gap for a siege
>obligatory
>vikings
>>550911
>Denmark-Norway
wut
>>550731
yeah, same. OED seems to suggest wounded in British parlance as well, and that's how I've always known it too.
>>550925
The Eternal Anglo attacked a neutral state, forcing it to ally with France.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_San_Jacinto
mexicans BTFO
lazy asses were taking a siesta LOL
Those pathetic Ottomans. Can`t defend a city even when they outnumber the enemy.
>>550957
[citation needed]
Another massive kebab removal by Suvorov.
>>550963
>historic battles are not history XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
>>550977
dick measuring with numbers is /int/ territory
>>550970
>Citation needed
Literally unbelievable
>>550948
Dude, that's like shooting a sleeping man and calling it single combat
Her Majesty's boys slotting some spear chukkers, yes lads. The film's good too.
>>550997
So is slaughtering 300 men who surrendered at goliad, and the dozen or so that surrendered at the Alamo.
>>550573
>your country
last time I checked there's only one USA and none CSA in a modern day map.
bitch please
>>548553
the viet cong just cant handle bantz
>>550592
What's romanticised about that, retard?
>>551088
calling it a battle
>>551226
To be honest they shouldn't even call it a war. It was more of a minor squabble.
BIG
>all these shitty battles where defenders win
it's only impressive if the outnumbered side is also the offensive side
>>551282
>Dissolution of the
>Holy
>Roman
>Empire
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VL7XS_8qgXM
>>551307
Brits explain yourselves
>>551316
>Brits explain yourselves
We made our counter-argument many years ago, friend.
Sweden BTFO
>>551307
>Jean Lafitte
>american flag
keked at the 500 brits, but honestly, if they were wounded or just couldn't go further, why not do this, why would they die for a stupid commander sending a frontal attack without visibility
>this frightens the euro
>>551335
Because that is what your slave masters demand.
>>551349
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Vienna
War of the Pacific, best day in Chile's history, we gained the territory that sustains our economy to this day, we landlocked Bolivia, and fucked their shit up along Peru, with a bunch of fearsome soldiers fueled with "cachupilca del diablo" which is a shitty liquor mixed with gunpowder that created a fungi within the bottle that gave the soldiers a berserk effect (a la vikings with amanita muscaria), whenever they drank it before battle.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_the_Pacific
>>550925
They used to be in personal union and a European middle power. The British attacked them in 1801 to destroy the so-called 'League of Armed Neutrality'.
Wellington's greatest victory coming through.
>>548487
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six-Day_War
not "my" country as I am a citizen of reality, but posted for the sake of discussion.
>>551411
>I am a citizen of reality
Pfffffffftt hahahahhahahahahahah, holy shit. I bet you use a Delusional Pasport to travel the world too.
>>551410
Now let's look at his worst defeats
>>548572
>filename
You're thinking of Formigny or Castillon, not Patay
honestly 99% of our victories are when we were outnumbered, we just didn't like to have big standing army because we were greedy and corrupt as fuck.
It's something
>>548572
I've never heard of this battle but judging by the text under the picture and the filename I'm assuming it was knights and artillery vs archers and peasants. That's not so bad if that's the case.
>>548487
>V-v-viva
>M-m-mexico
>>551542
>letting a priest command your "army"
this is why i became an individualist, those people are not my history and i have nothing to do with them
>>551499
Funny how the Austrians and Germans get their asses saved by the Commonwealth at Vienna but end up destroying it a century later, and the Ottomans are the only ones to protest.
>>551470
>Still identifying yourself with "le epic human made borders and nationality"
>A passport holds any value other than a tool to regulate current human affairs
>Implying I'm the delusional one and not you
keep giving power to human made construct that divide humanity and help bring pain and suffering to people everywhere.
>>551594
im more amused by dumb polacks crying about muh honor as for reason why they are shit at leading their own country
>>551607
Keep being a naive bitch with no notion of how society works.
>duude everything is a social cosntruct lmao!
No shit Sherlock, they are there for a plethora of reasons
>>548487
>your country
why does it have to be my country?..
what if I'm Italy? even if the opponent is outnumbered I'd lose. this game blows.
>>551615
>they are there for a plethora of reasons
of course to keep idiots like you divided so you will be easier to control, but it's even better because you actually think it's necessary or good for you.
>>551335
He was a pirate, smuggler, and a swindler so he's American at heart.
Muahm.
>>551316
Turns out conscripting German debtors doesn't do much good for the morale of an army.
>>551499
Your polish cavalry excelled at breaking formations and your opponents usually lacked any cavalry that could compete.
>>551471
>Viscount Wellington
>Marquess of Wellington
>Duke of Wellington
Kek why was he getting promoted all the time despite those defeats?
>>551587
>this is why i became an individualist, those people are not my history and i have nothing to do with them
>>550957
>masterless samurai
Sunt tare, şi nimeni nu poate să mă doboare, am putere mare !
>>548487
pinoy stronkkk
>>548487
pick one
hello
>>552280
[citation needed]
Emu here. Do I even need to post the pic?
I love the Armenians for the sheer buttdevestation they cause to the turds.
>>552511
>so many battles vs country you occupied
why turks are so shit at menaging their own subjects
>>552511
>shoot villagers with guns granted by russians
>WE WUZ BASED AND SHIET
yeah, and then you got genocided right after a small part of the army came back :))
>>551322
That happened before jacksons battle in Louisiana though
>>548487
Spain here. Fighting while outnumbered is business as usual in our military history.
https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sitio_de_Cartagena_de_Indias_(1741)
>>552559
T*rks on suicide watch
This is the only thing I could think of from the modern republic.
>>552559
>butcher women and children of said villages
>we wuz honorable civilization and shieet
>also we dindunuffins
>>548487
Portugal in the battle of Aljubarrota.
>>552693
>Post battles where your country was outnumbered and won
>It was the Irish that were outnumbered
>still a better K/D ratio
what?
>>552722
I couldn't find anything where they were outnumbered and won
>>552746
So why even post at all?
>>552180
The joys of aristocracy (as opposed to meritocracy in Napoleonic France).
If the British had applied meritocracy too, they'd probably have had a more competent general and it thus wouldnt have taken them 6 fucking years to take back Spain, a secondary theater the French barely cared about.
>>552635
This ones look good too because virtual annihilation
https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batalla_de_Noordhorn
https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batalla_de_Gembloux
>>552748
I dont know
>>551045
Was this the siege on which Kadare based his book?
Very heavy meaning they got wiped out. Like literally. Charles Robert barely made it out.
>>552771
This one with the French btfo...
https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batalla_del_Garellano_(1503)
Actually, I've realized the rare occasions we were the ones significantly outnumbering the enemy, basically the Portuguese, we could not into win.
Mental note: go outnumbered next time we march into Portugal.
>>551322
>bragging about battles from a war you lost
why do europeons consider this acceptable?
>>553046
1. US started it
2. They failed to achieve all their ends
3. Result: status quo ante bellum
No one won that war, in all likelihood it was an American failure. Hence its either forgotten about or lied about by... Americans!
Oh and don't even bother claiming the press ganging of US sailors was stopped by the US, the British stopped it before the Americans found out.
>>550650
fuck didn't expect another crnogorac here
Gonna spam a little, there are quite a few of those.
>>553235
>>553237
>>550912
All hail Yi sun sin.
So many of these are bullshit
>Muh outnumbered disadvantage
>Possess far better trained and equipped units than 'greater' force
>>548487
Where are the Aussies vs. The Emus? I heard they lost that one.
>>548487
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Neches
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Jamrud
>91,000 Sikhs BTFO by 29,000 Afghans
>>552657
>irregulars
>ie pitchforks
:))
>>550650
Based Monteniggers, fuck the Albos.
>>551045
>8000 vs 160.000
>[citation needed]
>>548487
>>551290
fuck off, green
>>551041
Tell that to the north and south. Neither side has really gotten along too much since the war.
>>548487
>outnumbered
>26:30 according to the most conservative estimates
you're country's a shit
>>550911
>US siding with the coalition
wut
>>553106
>britain enslaves american sailors
>america goes to war to stop it
>no territorial changes officially but britain's indian allies are destroyed and america gains real control over the northwest
>bongs calls this "failure"
lol, by our standards it's not one of our better outings but we still gained considerably by doing it.
>>551471
>his noble title being raised after each of those defeats
and the funniest part is that wasn't even the grande armée but reserves and greenies.
but it would be lovely to see him fighting napoleon in portugal he would probably be demoted to the point where he would have to pick a rifle and fight as a foot soldier
>>555123
Quasi war
>>551349
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Sevan
>>554365
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_of_Van_(1915)
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Sardarabad
>>548553
kek
>>550573
Jesus shit are we certain Bulter/Pierce showed up that day? 8 fucking guys, probably killed on accident.
>>551290
>tfw you beat someone so hard their country ceases to be known by the same name
>>551316
no prob m8, here ya go
>>550956
31k-35k, more guns and sea support, including that russian army had better quality than the ottoman does not qualify for this thread
I am an American on a phone but as a successor to the Roman republic I would say the battle of magnesia. No pics though.
Anyone mention Andrew Jackson?
>>548487
>British veterans blown the fuck out by a handful of militia, pirates, and soldiers
Take special note of the 500 British cowards who pretended to be dead and then surrendered.
>>560256
>>551393
wena qlo
I believe this qualifies.
>>548487
Savages btfo
