Why don't christians believe that mohammed was the second coming of jesus?
>>524872
neither do Muslims but you knew this before you made this thread you dumb frog poster
>>524872
because no one ever defended that stance, including mohammed
Firstly, when Jesus comes again it will be in Glory. He won't re-incarnate himself (WTF).
Secondly, Muhammad never even claimed to be Jesus and referred to Jesus as another person.
Its like asking "why don't atheists believe Reagan is the second coming of Washington, they are both presidents".
>>524963
>it will be in glory
What does that mean?
>>524947
No, Mohammed refered to Jesus as the christ, the messiah, on the other hand he was a prophet like Abraham or Mary. Direct line to god, but he wasn't his incarnation or anything, just great pals and golf buddies.
>>524947
You do realize taht in the Judeo-Christian tradition, there are way more prophets than those two, right?
Look, I shit on Christians. A lot. I think their beliefs are asinine and not even really drawn from the holy books they claim to venerate. But this is a whole new level of retardation.
You should seriously consider sterilizing yourself, for the good of our species.
>>524963
>"why don't atheists believe Reagan is the second coming of Washington, they are both presidents".
great meme idea, let me take notes
Because Mohammad wasn't a failure
>>524872
Not even Muslims believe that. Why should Christians?
>>524974
>Christianity
>a failure
is this bait?
It just wasn't as successful as Islam (in World Population terms).
>>524966
At the End of Days, to save the world. Islam says the same thing. They are two different people.
If this thread genuinely isn't trolling then holy fucking shit
>>524984
Christianity wasn't a failure, but Jesus certainly was.
Peter converted way more people than Jesus ever did.
>>524984
>It just wasn't as successful as Islam
There have been a greater number of Christians than Muslims in the world for centuries
>>524984
Would Jesus even be remembered had it not been for Paul?
>>524992
Would Peter consider Jesus a failure?
>>524999
Would Paul ever had done anything without Christ to teach him, trips?
>>524996
is the success of a religion decided on how many people follow it?
Shouldn't the success of a religion be based on how good that religion is?
>>524989
That's not what "in glory" means.
>>524966
It means he will be in a glorified body, free from all weakness and deformity. The same body he rose from the tomb with. Christianity doesn't believe in "reincarnation" and Jesus won't have another earthly birth or another body. That idea is contrary towards orthodox Christian teaching and is mostly relegated to very few and very tiny splinters.
>>525005
The person I quoted specifically stated in terms of numbers
>>524872
bc they think that mohammed is wrong
>>525004
Paul never met Jesus, he freaked out on the road to Damascus after taking Psilocybin shrooms to pass the time
Now check these digits
>>525005
no, there's no point discussing that because it's entirely subjective. i prefered the previous baiting route.
>>524970
>>524872
Phopnet Jesus of Nazareth is like wine, music, pictures, sculpture and hating war.
Phopnet Mahomet (yeah, people of an allah do not know correct pronunciation name of their phopnet) had different opinions from ideals of Jesus of Nazareth. Guess, with that pronunciation troubles, quran of Aravian peninsula (at old-judish «arava» — "desert"),
full with old Aravian words and non-traditional meaning can nowadays contain a lot of errors of understanding.
>>524947
>Jesus was a prophet
Heretics go die pls
>>525898
At least you are heretics too because you are not a chistian because you are hate your a neighbor.
>>525884
>Phopnet
>Aravian
why the shitspellings
>>525935
>Aravian
Simply an ancient original name of the country.
>>525935
>Phopnet
Prophet, yes. Thanks for fixing an error.
>>524872
Read revelations and come back, idiot.
>>524872
because he wasn't exactly Christ-like in his words and actions.
