>>503015
I just have to point out that man's utterly wiry/silky beard. Damn.
>>503225
Did nothing is more like the case here.
All staunch anti-communists
>>503269
>>503274
sup /pol/
Robespierre
>>504372
>anti-communism makes you /pol/
communists are bloodthirsty tyrants and the scum of the Earth
>>503044
>killing 80 million people isn't wrong
commie bastard
>>504409
>80 million
>>504372
Hello /pol/.
False flagging again, I see.
>>504409
>china
>communist
lel
>>504432
I'm actually a communist but hey, whatever fits your narrative.
>>504471
>implying communism isn't just as /pol/ as national socialism
>>504479
>implying the reactionaries on /pol/ even understand the differences between fascism, socialism, and communism
Surprised this hasn't been posted yet baka
>>504372
People like you are more annoying than stormniggers.
Seriously leave the entire fucking site.
>>504540
He failed to exterminate the eternal parasite, now they have the "holocaust" card to cry with.
>>504471
>communist
I'm eastern european and I want to strangle you for having such dangerous views.
>>504449
>Mao
>not a communist
>>504607
gee anon, if it's written on that image he was i'm sure you must be right
>>504613
>Mao Zedong, Communist revolutionary founding father of the People's Republic of China and founder and Chairman of the Communist Party of China
>not a communist
* tips Ushanka *
m'comrade
>>504579
You might want to leave the debate altogether, then, if you're so easily triggered into doing physical harm to another human for something that is only going on in his mind.
Seriously. What makes you any different from the communists-in-name-only that you seem to fear so much if you're just as willing as them to resort to political violence?
Maybe you're the problem, then, and not the idea.
>>504372
Never fucking reply to me again unless you're contributing to the thread.
>>504640
"Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun." - Mao Zedong.
Considering the amount of political suppression and violence directed towards socialists (and even "too socialist for their own good" kind of people) practiced in the "free", "democratic" countries not under communist umbrella, you have to be utterly fucking brainless to not see a reason why the only "succesful" communist leaders (i.e. got to rule, NOT DEAD) were ruthless, violent bastards. It's the only kind that wasn't assassinated out of office by domestic and external forces the minute they stepped on some wealthy, influential people's toes. Just because someone's leading a fight against communism doesn't mean they're right - for example, the land-owners' sons' US-backed counter-revolution in Cuba - how do you think it would have ended up had they won? In increase in public wealth? Give me a break.
Just so it's clear, I'm not defending the guy. But comparing liberal, democratic communists to Mao or Stalin is just as fair as it would be to compare free-thinking capitalists to Pinochet or Mannerheim; nil.
>>504640
If I as a non-Muslim man were to burst into a crowded area shouting "ALLAHU AKBAR" whilst gunning down everyone in sight, does that make me a representative of Islam just because a few ISIS twitter pages approve? No, that'd be retarded. Just because someone declares themselves to be in the name of x,y, or z ideology does not mean that they are an accurate representation of the whole (ESPECIALLY when discussing a broad spectrum of ideologies that are encompassed under "communism").
Mao's ideology (along with being third-worldist trash) made little attempts to actually establish communism. He set up a state-capitalist authoritarian state out of the gates, and used communist imagery for populist appeal. Deng Xiaoping later took this and reformed the Chinese "Communist" party policy to more directly reflect this attitude. Aside from the imagery and naming conventions, China hardly pretends to even be communist anymore.
>>504487
>implying there are differences between fascism and communism besides the marketing
>>503015
ITT:
>hurrdurr back to /pol/
>hurrdurr back to /ussr/
This is why we can't have nice things
>>504372
This is you
>>504841
Well he exterminated "6 million" jews so at least he did something right
The only thing wrong he did was die too early
>>504905
>those heels
when will they ever learn?
>>504877
Im guessing by your "irony" marks that you belive hitler dident kill any jews
if you belive that it means he did nothing rigth
yet you still want his tiny german cock in your mouth?
>>505437
nah I believe he killed millions of jews just not 6 million.
Maybe 4,5, max 5
>>504820
Boom fucking this
>>504487
>implying you even know what reactionary means
>>504487
>implying there even is a difference
>>504829
>The No True Scotsman fallacy is a logical fallacy that occurs when; someone changes the definition of a word to make a claim true by default, or a term is preemptively given a biased definition designed to exclude elements vulnerable to criticism, yet making sure to still include all things praiseworthy.
>>504829
>makes a dogshit analogy
>proves himself wrong with it anyway
wew lad, you moved the goalposts onto a false equivalency bridge that collapsed under you. It'd be impressive if it weren't so pathetic.
>>505484
I know this is a meme thread, but Jackson did everything wrong.
>>505600
libertarians please leave.
>>505600
hayek looks like such a fucking worm
literally the most punchable face of all time
Prove me wrong
>Protip: you cant
Except dying too soon.
>>504741
No, he's right. If you support something as cancerous as Communism, you deserve to go to Commie hell.
>>505484
unironic 100% truth
>>504909
Sun Yat-Sen is my waifu
>BOHEMIANS
>WHEN WILL THEY EVVER LEARN
>>504409
Communism is fun :)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fSQgCy_iIcc
>>511401
fuck that guy
>>504540
He was a terrible leader and in the end was ruined by his sheer hubris and unwillingness to take advice from the multitude of skilled commanders around him
