So, how does /his/ divide the timeline of european history?
>~500 BCE +- 200 Starting age
>0 +-200 Golden age
>900 CE +-500 Warring Tribes
>1700 CE +- 200 Pre-Modern Colonialism
>1950 CE +-30 World Wars
>>480413
>>480902
>>480413
HAVEN'T YOU HEARD THAT HISTORICAL CHRONOLOGY AS WE KNOW IT NOW IS A LIE?!
>>480905
>humanism
>immoral rationalism
what
>timeline of european history, not going back to the Cromagnon
>>481116
>egalitarian socialist humanism
>>481127
>not going back to the Neanderthals
That's racist.
>>480413
8000 bc-6000 bc, true prehistory
6000 bc-3000 bc, predeluvian
3000 bc-1000 bc, postdeluvian
1000 bc-500 bc, preroman classical
500bc-0bc/0ad, roman classical
0ad-325ad, preabrahamocentric classical
325ad-742ad, postclassical era
742-1512, abrahamocentric era
1512-1776, pre-democratic era
1776-1914, anglocentric era
1914-1945, early modern
1945-1985, modern era
1985-present, postmodern era
>>480905
>starting the new era at 1776 rather than 1789
Ameriself-importants everyone
>>481155
lol
>>481158
The American Revolution was a pretty big event m8, and necessarily preceded the French.
Especially if the context is New/Old World schism.
>>481155
>1776-1914, anglocentric era
It really started in 1815
>>481155
>implying the anglocentric era ended in 1914
More like it started then.
>>481167
>The American Revolution was a pretty big event m8
It wasnt
It is, with the hindsight, now that we know what the US have become
But when it happened it was literally nothing
Your average dude outside of the 13 colonies wasnt even aware it had occured
The French Revolution is what really changed the world, not the American one
>>480413
>So, how does /his/ divide the timeline of european history?
Purely for gestural convenience.
>>481167
>The American Revolution was a pretty big event
>necessarily preceded the French
top kek
Isn't "modern" a shitty name, considering it won't be considered modern anymore in the future? "Industrial" would be better
>>481149
Neanderthals were humanoid, not fully or behaviorally human
>>481396
That's what a racist would say.
>>481396
What about black people?
