>salt of the earth
What did he mean by this?
>>594164
JESUS IN THAT DEPICTION, IS HOLDING "THE BOOK OF 4CHAN".
>>salt of the earth
>What did he mean by this?
THE VERSE CONTAINING THAT TERM MEANS THAT THE GNOSTIC ONES ARE THE MATERIAL WORLD'S MEDIUM TOWARD GOD, AND THAT IF THEY LOSE THEIR GNOSIS, THEY ARE ESSENTIALLY WORTHLESS.
SALT INCREASES ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, AND IS THUS A MEDIUM FOR ELECTRICITY, AND ELECTRICITY TRAVELS VIA THE AETHER WHICH IS THE UNIVERSAL MEDIUM, WHICH EMANATES DIRECTLY FROM GOD, SO, SALT, BY INCREASING ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, IS THE MATERIAL FACILITATOR OF THE GODLY.
SALT = THE GNOSTIC ONES.
EARTH = THE MATERIAL ZONE.
>>594195
Then Gnostics inherit the material zone?
>>594220
NO; THEY TRANSCEND IT —TRANSCENDENCE ESSENTIALLY IS THE TELOS OF (TRUE) CHRISTIANITY.
>>594228
But he says they will "inherit" the earth, not "transcend" it.
How is Gnosticism Christianity when they don't think Jesus was the Messiah (Christ)?
San Francisco
>>594231
>But he says they will "inherit" the earth, not "transcend" it.
"TO INHERIT THE EARTH" IS A FIGURATIVE EXPRESSION; IT ESSENTIALLY MEANS "TO BECOME ACTUAL IN THE WORLD" SINCE THE GNOSTIC ONES ARE THE ONES IN COMMUNION WITH THE GODLY, THUS, THEY WILL RULE EARTH BY ACTUATING "GOD'S WILL", BUT THAT DOES NOT ENTAIL THAT THIS IS THE ULTIMATE PURPOSE —THE TELOS—; IT IS JUST A PARTIAL PURPOSE.
>How is Gnosticism Christianity when they don't think Jesus was the Messiah (Christ)?
1. CHRISTIANITY DOES NOT CONSIST IN CULT OF PERSONALITY, NOR IN WORSHIPING A DEITY, OR IDOL.
2. THE CONCEPT OF A "MESSIAH", OR ANY OTHER KIND OF "ANOINTED SAVIOUR", IS AN ENTIRELY JEWISH CONCEPT, NOT A CHRISTIAN ONE.
>>594164
The thing that gives flavour. But not from the sea (empire) but from the land (national/popular).
>>594266
"Christ" is just Greek for "Messiah".
>>594285
THAT IS IRRELEVANT; IT IS NOT THE "POINT".
>>594285
Canada is just French for Chicago
>>594304
It kind of is you daft wetback cunt.
>>594305
Christos is a literal translation of messiah.
