What are your thoughts?
Depends on the subject.
Can analytic philosophy explain love?
Why do i see people spamming the same fucking shit threads all day?
>>430666
>Can analytic philosophy explain love?
It can, but it depends on what kind of explanation you want. Do you want the scientific explanation, or the phenomenological explanation?
>>430682
I'd probably like the explanation that holds the most meaning to my life
>>430699
Something resonating with the reader is a literary concern much more than it is a philosophical one. An explanation having meaning to your life need not be a reflection of its truth.
What, exactly, is in need of explaining with regard to love?
>believing there is a divide
not event the analytic philosophers believe this. See Quin.
>>430666
>Can analytic philosophy explain love?
https://www.philpapers.org/archive/sinPG
>>430666
Why not?
>>430699
Well then, which is that?
The divide is idiotic.
>>430671
/his/ is literally reddit: the board.
Philosophy without application is completely useless. You might as well be doing Sudoku.
>>432494
Sudoku is the epitome of human thought.
Pic related
