>At least 505 kills.
>In 100 days.
>With iron sights.
>In -40F to -20F temperatures.
>Would stuff snow into his mouth to stop his breath from steaming
>Artillery strikes couldn't didn't kill him.
>Takes explosive round to face.
>Survived.
Will there ever be anyone more badass than Simo Häyhä?
You missed /k/ desu. Not disagreeing with you but you'll actually get replies there.
>>391170
I see. Will take thread there than.
>>391162
You forgot the 200+ kills he made with his Suomi submachine gun.
>>391162
Is there any verifiable proof as to his number of kills? That's always come off more like inflated propaganda imo.
>>391173
It isn't a particularly historically interesting thread, because the answer is "Yes, but it is hard to think of someone that was well documented, and individual badasses aren't that important anyway."
Think of it like you're posting the Navy Seal pasta… how many replies would you expect that to get?
No match for this killstreak
>>391321
this made me laff.
>>391321
>bomb named after manlets is the most bloodthirsty
Typical.
>>391321
A multi isn't a streak
>>391391
It can be
Why does everybody not doubt this guy? Obviously he didn't get 500 kills. That only happens in modern bullshit wars against helpless peasants.
I'd still bet he was a badass and probably got over tens kills, but there are millions of anonymous peasants that died instantly.
>>391400
He operated for 100 days against a foe that marched in straight lines with no winter camo uniforms. Getting 4-5 kills per day isn't shocking. He just had an incredibly ill led enemy.
>>391400
These guys don't look too hard to see and shoot.
>>391284
yeah, because if there's something that the finnish are known for is for being the kings of propaganda.
>>391162
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlos_Hathcock
>>391162
I mean
probably
>>391162
This thread is on \k\ every second week or so.
>>>/x/28160427
