Can we at least agree that Rhodesia was the best country that's existed in Africa in the last 2000 years?
If Biafra would have survived it would probably beat Rhodesia. But thanks to the Eternal Anglo suporting Nigeria that didn't happen.
>>336012
Apartheid South Africa was significantly better, and would've been much more sustainable, had the sanctions not been put in place. Botswana's getting up there, and if we count North Africa, Gaddafi-era Libya was even better.
>What is glorious Biafra?
>>336055
>Gaddafi-era Libya was even better.
This. I can't handle all the bullshit that is being spewed about Gaddafi's "reign of terror". He was a dictator, that's for sure, but he was a benevolent dictator. Everything was slowly and steadily growing better under his rule. Though he also made sure he always got the biggest piece of the cake.
>>336096
He also shot down an airliner. Libya is in a shitty place now but it's gotta go through the phases to become a real country. It's actually one if the few mostly ethnically and religiously homogeneous countries so it has a real chance to succeed.
>>336096
>Gaddafi
>Dindu notin wrong
No he was a pretty horrible person, and the son that would take his place was even worse. The revolution was going to come sooner or later because obviously the peasants don't agree.
Since this is /his/ have some Leptis Magna, which I've had the good fortune of visiting
>Can we at least agree that Rhodesia was the best country that's existed in Africa in the last 2000 years?
What about the Roman empire?
>>336012
Its not even close unless you exclude all of North Africa, South Africa, parts of West Africa like Ghana and the historical kingdoms there as well as in the East and all the islands like the seychelles and zanzibar. Only then does Rhodesia start looking good
>>336012
Rhodesia again?
>>336380
> Roman Empire
> not a bunch of wanna be greeks
>>336012
Not even close senpai
>>336023
Calm down Hans
>>336078
>>336023
DID NOTHING WRONG
>>336023
This 2bh. Rhodesian kekboys who can't even beat bush niggers can go get fucked.
>>336485
He's right, though. It was Nigeria (backed by Soviets and Brits) vs Biafra (backed by the Catholic Church and humanitarian groups).
>>336876
I was more referring to the autistic germans going on about the eternal anglo than the example itself.
>>336876
>Biafra (backed by the Catholic Church and humanitarian groups)
and funnily enough, recognised as a country by rhodesia and south africa
>>336893
>the eternal anglo
Success breeds jealousy.
>>336452
literally shit
>>336023
>freedom and self-determination for Africa
>not you Biafra, you have to remain oppressed by Nigeria
Whyare brits such backstabbing cunts?
>>338045
The Nigerian government are the same people that the brits put in charge of the colony of Nigeria. The Igbo didn't make good puppets.
had he lived longer and finished up his work Burkina Faso would be the best African nation
>>336012
>Can we at least agree
No.
>>336012
South Africa is better loser.
Rhodesia would've been keked to South Africa's will just like Canada is to America
