>>331266
>expressionalism
Yeah, nah

First off, no. Second, what is "expressionalism?" Third, field recordings are awesome. Take your shit and get out

>Magnum Opuses

Yeah you know what dude? Today I think I'm gonna make a Magnum Opus. Yeah that's my favorite type of art nice.

>>331266
Yes

>>331303
>type of art

Did you even read the post? These are FORMS of beauty. Not types of art.

>>331266
art is so loosly defined just about anything you do day to day would be hailed as some thaught provoking masterpiece

>>331266
this is bait

>>331266
>creative trades
>low tier
Been a hobbyist of video games my entire life and I can say this is true. It's a shit industry and the only time good games come out is maybe five times a decade on accident.

>>331474

The word forms is nowhere to be found in the image or the OP

>>331787
Video games are such wasted potential.

>>331787
>games
Now this is bait

100% OBJECTIVE AND OFFICIAL POWER RANKING OF THE ARTS:

1. WAGNER'S VISION OF THE ARTWORK OF THE FUTURE
[minor power gap]
2. OPERA
3. THEATER (PRETTY MUCH ONLY LEGIT WHEN IT'S A DRAMA OR AN EPIC)
4. MUSIC
5. SCULPTURE
6. PAINTING
7. POETRY
8. LITERATURE
9. ARCHITECTURE

POWER GAP

10. PHOTOGRAPHY
11. DANCE
12. CINEMA AND TELEVSION


####### GIANT POWER GAP #######


13. VIDEO GAMES

.
.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ########### OMEGA POWER GAP ########### !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
.
.

900000001. THE REST

.
.
.
.

900000000000000000001. ANIME

>>331811
The thing is, exceptions are quite huge. Animes legend of the galactic heroes is probably the best sci fi universe ever made.

>>331851
Yeah, to be honest I just put the Anime note there for troll purposes. All the other points are sincere.

>>331792
>not using the power of intuition to determine what the hierarchy is addressing
Did someone say plebian?

>>331797
Not when you take games like mass effect, or dead space

>>331888
Mass effect is wasted potential, so is dead space.

>>331933
Ur wasted potential

>>331876

A magnum opus is not a form either so your original point is moot. It is simply a term given to the greatest piece made my an artist.

>field recordings
>shit tier
pleb

>>332031
Let's test that logic shall we:
>artist
Artists make art which is a form of beauty.
>magnum opus
An artists greatest piece. This is a subcategory of art and a sub-subcategory of a beauty form.

So why couldnt one categorize a hierarchy with sub-subcategories?

What the hell are you on? I sniff pleb all over you. Read a book

>>332069

>This is a subcategory of art and a sub-subcategory of a beauty form.

It's about as much a subcategory as something like "bad art" and "good art." It's completely subjective and there are no objective traits as to how define it. A certain piece can have wide appraisal as an artist's magnum opus, but that doesn't stop critics from claiming another piece to be so either.

>So why couldnt one categorize a hierarchy with sub-subcategories?

Why categorize everything like that? What's the point? There's no point in being a meticulous assburger over this.

>What the hell are you on? I sniff pleb all over you. Read a book

*tip tip tip*