Ok, bitches, let's start and argument.
Choose a side: analytic philosophy or continental bullshit
Go!
>>330281
>argument
define ''argument''
analytic FTW!
>>330284
well, not in the well reasoned exchange of views sense
obviously not in the sense used in formal logic
More like ANALytic amirite
>islander Hume is btfo by based Kant
>every next islander philosopher is butthurt
>muh I can't understand this sheatt, it must be just pretencious
>adjusts bowtie
>sip tea
>from now on, I will work on real and practical philosophy
>LOGIC
>russel's lifes work gets BTFO by Gödel
>quits logic because of Wittgenstein
>"at last I truly see, it's not just continental philosophy that is useless, it is all philosophy! it's all just language games, hah! Let's abandon the field"
Bravo, bravissimo
>Wittgenstein
>Popper
>Ayer
Jewish
>Heigedder
>Foucault
>Nietzsche
Aryan
/thread
What a pleb thread
>>330337
your mama is a pleb
>>330284
a set of propositions, at least one of which is a conclusion and the rest premises. the premises are supposed to support the conclusion
>>330337
Define pleb, pleb.
>>330357
Such a pleb definition.
>>330333
>Ayer
only his mother was jewish, his dad was protestant - I think AJ was christian too
>>330365
>only his mother was jewish
Exactly
>>330365
>only his mother was Jewish
>his mother was Jewish
There it is.
>mfw I like Hume, Nietzsche, Schopenhauer and Popper
What does that make me?
>>330379
A huge pleb. Literally the worst of both worlds.
>>330379
Someone who actually reads philosophy.
>>330387
no, you read outdated metaphysical mystical nonsense you bastard
>>330391
None of those write mystical nonsense you utter ruffian.
>>330379
Someone of good taste
>>330397
obviously you continental twats are completely ignorant of the most basic rules logic and the language usage. thinking that heigedder or nietzsche make any sense whatsoever is a case in point.
carnap ftw
>>330379
Popper was only analytic in style, his content was basically an attack on the inbred anglos like Russell
>>330411
Don't worry, one day you'll grow up little autist, even Sperglord-Supreme Wittgenstein did (somewhat).
>>330432
you need to ease up on that dasein you impotent bastard. foucault yourself in the ass!
>>330411
>even though logical positivism got BTFO and abandoned ages ago, I'm just gonna pretend it's still the end-all-be-all because I'm too lazy to read and I like the logic part in its name :DD
>>330446
lp had it's problems. but, it explained clearly, for any but the dumbest peasant (you), why transcendental mysticism bullshit should be abandoned.
S. Kripke, D. Lewis, R.M. Hare FTW!
>>330333
>Heigedder
>Foucault
These are some of the worst and most overrated philosophers the world has seen. Nietzsche wasn't Aryan, too.
>>330476
mystics, not philosophers
>muh Wittgenstein
>>330471
>ameriburger "philosophers"
I rest my case, fatty.
>>330476
>>330482
>>330486
Kek
>>330500
typical continental bastard, ad hominem reasoning...
btw, i am not from the us
>mfw analytics don't realize that Godel's incompleteness theorem proved that logic is a useless system
Oh wow haha
>>330512
You are mentally amerifat considering you can't even type and talk like 14 year old kid from facebook with your ebin "smartphone talk" abbreviations and random ellipses.
>>330532
you don't deserve complete words you autistic inbred bitch
>>330541
>gets triggered because I exposed his mental infancy
Oh man, you should have put another ellipsis at the end of your sentence, it makes you sound so much more "intellectual" and "mysterious" and "witty" like you desperately want to appear as.
>>330518
shh you're gonna trigger the STEM autists
don't destroy their safe space of 'logic' and 'truth'
Continental is fucking gay lefty shit
Thread/
>>330555
I know you are, but what am I?
>>330568
Russel was literally reddit personified.
>>330568
>Nie "everyone who is nice is a kekold" tzsche
>Hei "14/88 my fuhrer" degger
>left
Epic, simply epic
On the other hand analytics
>Russell literally said kekoldry is ok
>tipped his fedora hard
>got butthurt about how "mean" Nietzsches ethics were and wrote a huge ad hominem text about it
>>330577
What's wrong with reddit? Just because it's not pretentious snob shit like /lit/ doesn't mean it's a bad site, I've had some good discussions on there
>>330559
Actually I was baiting retards who don't understand math. And it worked!
>>330582
>What's wrong with reddit?
Analytics in a nutshell.
>>330592
You can't logically prove it's a bad site so just stop this discussion now. I'm deadly serious.
>>330600
>you can't logically prove that cückoldry is bad
Ok Russell
*adjusts bowtie*
>>330600
if he could logically prove anything, he wouldn't be a autistic continental retard
>>330281
Why do you keep making this same shit thread over and over again?
>>330611
Thank you! I really don't like these snobs who are anti-reddit just because it's popular.
>>330617
first time that i made it
>>330281
>Choose a side: analytic philosophy or continental bullshit
Anyone who choses a side in this is a retard and deserves never to be listened to again.
Analyzing conceptual schemes from a logical, semantic point of view is exactly as legitimate as uncovering their imbeddedness in historically emergent narratives.
>>330284
Dat repressed homosexuality.
>>330629
I have a hard time believing that. A different one is there every day with the same slant.
>>330630
show me how your statement is empirically verifiable or that it is a tautology, than we can talk about it
>>330658
>mfw the statement 'all statements must be empirically verifiable or analytic to have meaning' isn't epirically verifiable or analytic.
>>330658
Autistic swine
>>330281
I choose the seekrit option not to choose a side and enjoy the best of both.
Take that son!
>>330682
>tfw
>>330658
Since it was essentially a normative statement, neither need to apply; unless we're assuming particular metaethical positions, which in turn need to be argued for.
>>330675
because it is a precondition of language use
>>330725
This isn't empirically testable or analytic, either.
>analeltics
>>330725
No it isn't.
>>330734
if you want me to explain how that statement is excluded from the verification principle (or rather included) you should just ask. no need to embarrass yourself like this
>>330758
just saying "no, it isn't" might be considered valid in continental philosophy, but when having an intelligent discussion you should offer some arguments
bitch
>>330770
If I say God is good, you knwo what I mean. It isn't empirically verifiable, but it has meaning.
>>330781
actually no
given the christian interpretation of god, being good is one of his "perfections" - he is good by definition.
so saying it would be tautological.
however, until you define "good"and "god" i do not know what you mean.
your lack of education is disturbing
>>330761
>how that statement is excluded from the verification principle (or rather included)
>excluded
>(or rather included)
Analytics in charge of using language.
Analytic is irrelevant.
Continental in the last few decades is filled with Post Modern bullshit.
Last great philosopher was Kant.
>>330809
That's not how you spell Husserl
>>330790
God is something that has meaning despite not being empirically verifiable.
Falsification > Verification.
>>330790
>given the christian interpretation of god, being good is one of his "perfections" - he is good by definition.
Actually, that sentence is self-contradicory. If the perfect goodness of god is a finding of a particular interpretation, its assertion cannot be an analytic statement.
>analytics
>spend decades fighting among each other to establish le ebin ultimate truth foundation based on logic, only to get BTFO by Gödel, Quine etc.
>meanwhile continentals consistently impacted all aspects of society, influenced every hero, every villain, every great champion of humanity, built the very foundation of our political, judicial and ethical systems, were chopped up and diluted into every kind of conventional wisdom you see in literature and media
In the end analytics were nothing more than a bunch of autists who were too shit for genuine math so they tried for decades to accomplish something yet failed and the ultimate result was the same as before
>>330818
you are so stupid...
>>330827
Analytics were useless. Zero.
Continentals were negative for society. A lot of the problems in our society had their influence.
>>330832
No I am not.
>>330827
how the fuck are quine and godel not analytical philosophers?! retarded continental twat..
>nothing has meaning :D science :DDD
very helpful, clap clap
>>330853
>?!
>..
>no capitalization
Proving me right.
>>330880
Shut up. Now. Don't fucking try me.
>>330902
>>330835
>democracy
>universal human rights
>anti-nihilism
>negative
*tips fedora*
The only "problems" in society is the rampant materialistic narcissism that started with, surprise surprise, the decline of continental philosophy.
>>330930
>The only "problems" in society is the rampant materialistic narcissism that started with, surprise surprise, the decline of continental philosophy.
sterilization for all who write or utter continental bullshit like that
>>330943
>can't prove me wrong
>screech like an autist monkey
Hop back to tumblr little autist.
>>330952
shove that hipster fedora up your continental ass
>>330930
>democracy
>universal human rights
This is totally due to continental philosophy, right?
>anti-nihilism
Are we talking about the same people?
Do you think Marcuse had a positive effect on society?
>>330985
It's already been empirically proven that analytics are the fedora wearing cückholds in this very thread.
>can't prove me wrong
>screech like an autist monkey
>>331015
>This is totally due to continental philosophy, right?
Yes. Rousseau and Kant were continentals you fucking retard.
>Do you think Marcuse had a positive effect on society?
Not a philosopher, stop grasping at straws.
>>330328
>kant
>based
Are you fucking serious right now?
>>331062
Randbot detected.
>>330809
>Last great philosopher was Camus
fix'd that for you
>>330813
And that's not how you spell Heidegger.
