Was German National-Socialism basically a reaction to Soviet Bolshevism?
Was Hitler's racial and antisemitic ideology an attempt to reconstruct Marxism-Leninism in a way more appropriate to the German setting?
Was his segregationist and later genocidal policy a variation on the theme of the destruction of kulaks and Eastern-European ethnic purges?
>>438019
>basically
Fuck off with this weasel word bullshit.
>Was Hitler's racial and antisemitic ideology an attempt to reconstruct Marxism-Leninism in a way more appropriate to the German setting?
Do you know who Liebnicht was? Korsh?
Learn the history of the SPD, Spartakists, AAUD, KAPD and KPD before you open your trap with this shit again.
>Was his segregationist and later genocidal policy a variation on the theme of the destruction of kulaks and Eastern-European ethnic purges?
>theme
Themes exist in literature and documents, they don't exist in historiographical narratives except as a device. Human relationships aren't "thematic" except through active subjectivities producing themes.
>Eastern-European ethnic purges
…
Go wank to _Bloodlands_ and never post here again.
>>438023
>Go wank to _Bloodlands_
>implying that's a bad thing
OP was obviously going for Ernst Nolte more than Snyder though.
>>438023
>Liebknacht
>Korsch
Neither of those was Marxist-Leninist. Liebknecht died before the term was even coined.
>>438032
And how are you or OP going to define M-L, as if as you note it was of significance before the Maoists invented it… how are you going to make an "epochal" moment in socialism that starts sometime before Hitler's political engagement with national socialism?
>>438048
Actually Stalin invented the term (I think Mao came up with 'Revisionism'). But it's possible to trace it as a theory to some of Lenin's post-revolutionary writings, so around the time the NSDAP was formed. Regardless, Mein Kampf was written in the mid-20s.
>>438056
>intentionalism
I'm out of this shithole.
>>438058
>entering a discussion about Nazi ideology
>isn't willing to discuss ideology or completely underplays it
Why even bother
Btw, discussing ideology isn't exclusive to intentionalism.
>>438064
No, no it isn't, but predefining the discussion as one where ideology operates in a separate and purely ideal realm of individuals—I'm not fucking bothering. Phlogiston.
>>438023
Why are you such a cunt? Lord...
>>438023
Well there goes a potentially interesting thread ruined by another holier than thou cunt.
I hope you're proud of yourself.
>>438023
wehaveabadassoverhere.flac
