The history of every culture is the same, so it's irrelevant.

>>1406270
>Is Marxism inherently anti-traditional culture?
Yes.

>If so, why?
It's non-traditional and only people with daddy issues support it.

>>1406286
That is an extremely ignorant simplification

>>1406270

Yes. Marxism is against the notion of all separate cultures and traditions.

Why?

Because traditions and culture makes humans value each other differently, thus preventing a Marxist society being possible.

>>1406270
Yes to the extent that traditional culture is engineered to support and legitimize the existing hierarchy.

>>1406310
It's an extreme simplification, sure.

Why is it ignorant though?

>>1406270
Judaism

>>1406310
>>1406391
I want to know this as well. How is cultural evolution ignorant?

>>1406270
Yes, because it demands significant innovations in the infrastructure of a society, which will upset any established superstructures.

>>1406270
By traditional superstructures you mean traditional bases. Yes, Marxism is against traditional bases.

>>1406270
No, according to Marx, the original culture of humanity was communist in nature, ancient men lived in a classless, propertyless societies, which was destroyed when someone introduced private property. Marxism aims to return to that ancient state, making it the ultimate traditionalist ideology.