Did Nietzsche utterly demolish Christianity with his smackdown?
>Christianity destroyed for us the whole harvest of ancient civilization, and later it also destroyed for us the whole harvest of Mohammedan civilization. The wonderful culture of the Moors in Spain, which was fundamentally nearer to us and appealed more to our senses and tastes than that of Rome and Greece, was trampled down (—I do not say by what sort of feet—) Why? Because it had to thank noble and manly instincts for its origin—because it said yes to life, even to the rare and refined luxuriousness of Moorish life!... The crusaders later made war on something before which it would have been more fitting for them to have grovelled in the dust—a civilization beside which even that of our nineteenth century seems very poor and very “senile.”—What they wanted, of course, was booty: the orient was rich.... Let us put aside our prejudices! The crusades were a higher form of piracy, nothing more! The German nobility, which is fundamentally a Viking nobility, was in its element there: the church knew only too well how the German nobility was to be won.... The German noble, always the “Swiss guard” of the church, always in the service of every bad instinct of the church—but well paid.... Consider the fact that it is precisely the aid of German swords and German blood and valour that has enabled the church to carry through its war to the death upon everything noble on earth!
No. He fundamentally misses the central question (is it true.)
Also, lol 19th century historiagraphy.
>Crusaders were motivated by plunder
>German nobility are 'Vikings'
>Moorish decadence
At least Nietzsche can rest happy knowing Germany is now getting the harvest of Mohammedan civilization.
>Islam, which originated among the Semitic races also consisted of the Law and Tradition, regarded as a formative force, to which the Arab stocks of the origins provided a purer and nobler human material that was shaped by a warrior spirit. The Islamic law (shariah) is a divine law; its foundation, the Koran, is thought of as God’s very own word (kalam Allah) as well as a nonhuman work and an 'uncreated book' that exists in heaven ab eterno.
> Islam presents a traditional completeness, since the shariah and the sunna, that is, the exoteric law and tradition, have their complement not in a vague mysticism, but in full-fledged initiatory organisations (turuq) that are characterised by an esoteric teaching (tawil) and by the metaphysical doctrine of the Supreme Identity (tawhid). In these organizations, and in general in the shia, the recurrent notions of the masum, of the double prerogative of the isma (doctrinal infallibility), and of the impossibility of being stained by any sin (which is the prerogative of the leaders, the visible and invisible Imams and, the mujtahid) lead back to the line of an unbroken race shaped by a tradition at a higher level than both Judaism and the religious beliefs that conquered the West
>It is a great shame for any one to listen to the accusation that Islaam is a lie and that Muhammad was a fabricator and a deceiver. We saw that he remained steadfast upon his principles, with firm determination; kind and generous, compassionate, pious, virtuous, with real manhood, hardworking and sincere. Besides all these qualities, he was lenient with others, tolerant, kind, cheerful and praiseworthy and perhaps he would joke and tease his companions. He was just, truthful, smart, pure, magnanimous and present-minded; his face was radiant as if he had lights within him to illuminate the darkest of nights; he was a great man by nature who was not educated in a school nor nurtured by a teacher as he was not in need of any of this.
>>297131
REKT
>>297151
Weak slave-man detected
>I respect, more than do the Mamluks, God, his prophet Muhammad and the glorious Qur'an... we are true Muslims. Are we not the one who has destroyed the Pope who preached war against Muslims? Did we not destroy the Knights of Malta, because these fanatics believed that God wanted them to make war against the Muslims?
Nice thread.
>le Christianity is bad!
>goes insane
>sisters have to take care of him for the rest of his life
Nietzsche's last man theory was good but seriously he was a fedoralord.
>>297724
The Last Man is literally exactly the same thing as illustrated in Chapter Seven from Notes from the Underground.
>>297086
No, not really.
Did he really say that?
what a c uck.
>>297728
>Notes from the Underground
Sounds like a Drake album desu.
>>297744
It's a Hollywood Undead album.
>Hating everything in the world, Christian slaves placed their values into another realm, the kingdom of God. The slaves' "hate" comes from their negative experience of the masters; this experience they call “evil.” If someone is not evil - they reason - he must be good. The slaves, then, define themselves in terms of the masters. They have an imagined superiority as they submit to the dominance of these masters.
>>297086
Yes. Christianity was so demolished. His words tore it down and wiped it from the Earth. Can you imagine what those bloody Christians would be up to today had they continued to exist?
>>297086
Nobody gives a fuck about Nietzsche.
