Is it true that it was uncommon for women to shave their legs prior to the early 20th century?
Yes.
>>1383766
Yes but they also had less hair because their endocrine systems weren't fucked up by processed sugars and birth control pills.
Yes, but women are generally less hairy than men. Also pretty much only their husbands actually saw their naked legs.
>>1383809
>Also pretty much only their husbands actually saw their naked legs.
lol no
>>1383766
>prior to the early 20th century
So, over all cultures, over almost the entirety of human history? Obviously there are various answers to any questions like that.
Why are white suburban men so triggered by the idea that things are socially constructed, such as what one finds attractive?
You wouldn't have been bothered by the hair back then. You would have wanted a fat pale woman in a different historic time. You would have fucked twink boipussy in another time. Deal with it.
You're the triggered ones, lads.
>>1383980
>implying i'm not a stubble fetishist
>>1383826
>stockings
