Can we objectively say that Muhammad was one of the greatest warriors of all time? Does he beat out Alexander the Great? Many leaders in history tried to emulate Alexander but millions even today try to emulate Muhammad.
>>1372008
Khalid was much better, and I'd hardly say he is comparable to Alexander, especially considering they had completely different motives and means of fulfilling their goals, however in terms of scale, the muslims do win.
You'll hear a lot about the weakness of Iberia and North Africa though, to discredit them, although that'll depend on your own opinion.
I don't care much for him, but Khalid is great.
>>1372008
>desert nomad polygamist childfucker
>"greatest" warrior of all time
If that were true we'd all be speaking Arabic by now.
WE WUZ CONKERERZ N' SHIEEEEET!
>>1372008
well he was certainly the most successful when looking at time frame, people today still fight and die in his name and will probably continue to do so for a very long time.
>>1372008
We don't even know if he existed
>>1372008
Muhammad conquered like two villages
Does defeating a plague ridden, war weary Sassanid Empire and ERE really count as being the greatest warrior?
>>1372080
He didn't even do that, he was dead by then.
>>1372008
Mohammed barely conquered anything, that was his successors.
>>1372080
It wasn't him (pbuh).
>>1372008
How come Muslims don't get all genocidal about images like this. There is also that one of him going super saiyan.
>>1372176
Because most of those riots have some political angle to them, pushed and promoted by Islamists or radical Salafis out to make a public statement. They're almost like terror attacks in their goal, but more legal than planting bombs.
He literally had sex with a 9 year old girl. He was also a neckbeard who created the world's deadliest value system/religion. He was not great at anything except being a faggot
>>1372008
what happened with his leg
>>1372008
He really only captured Mecca and Medina. His generals and successors would go on to enlarge the Caliphate after his death. So no, not really. Also, how could you even think to compare him with Alexander? They're not even in the same realm of greatness. All he really did was create one of the most destructive and dangerous religions in history. He was never an amazing strategist.
Maybe if /his/ shitters actually know about history and his batshit insane religion we wouldnt have meme answer like these thread. He designed a religion perfectly tailored for warfare, being a muslims automatically makes you on a eternal state of warfare against everyone, every single part of the population were required to proselytize whether secretly or by swords, read more on dar al harb and dar of islam, this religion paved way for the arab people to keep their conquest spree even long after his death. From spain into central asia until later caliph finally settled down and adopted persian/byzantine bureaucracy
>>1372037
>If that were true we'd all be speaking Arabic by now.
Haha, you really think that you aren't going to speak arabic in 50 years?
>>1372997
t. Achmed
And yes I do. Silly Muslim.
>depiction of muhammad
Isn't this like a super heresy or something?
neither he nor anyone in that entire fucking desert had ever even heard of a warfare trench
they needed a persian to tell them about the concept of DIGGING A HOLE, and luckily for them, a traitor was happy to oblige.
t. Gholamreza Piroozi
He was more of a genius than a great military leader.
He was a schizophrenic pedophile who created a religion designed for inspiring his populace into a fit of endless bloody rage. Why do you think his 'prophecies' came in the form of conveniently timed 'revelations' which were given to him whenever somebody questioned his rule?
