Why bother with ethics when EVERYONE worships power in the end?
You take any guy who did bad things (whether mostly petty bad things like Steve jobs or full on extreme end of the spectrum like George bush or even Napoleon or Stalin) and soon enough they'll be respected and liked by most people.
This question may sound edgy but are ethics just a way to oppress the weak?
>>1329948
Hello Stirner, nice meme. I think I'll take it.
If you are too blatant about it people will resent you.
If you want to exercize raw power best to convince everyone that you are doing some right. Enough people that the other side can't dictate the narrative.
ethics are a way to oppress people who don't follow our social contract. i don't see them as a way to pick on the weak so much as pick on the different.
>>1329948
read nietzsche
if you want a tl:dr for your question:
yes
>>1329948
>Napoleon did bad things
Still buttmad about losing that noblese privledge?
>>1330497
How about wasting an entire generation of Frenchman to a fucking winter?
>posting Stirner instead of Nietzsche while talking about how power > slave morality
Thanks /lit/
>>1329948
Why so mad Max?
Tyrants aren't respected and liked by the people they oppressed.
You will not see people in china or korea celebrating Genghis Khan.
>>1331127
>caring about slave feelings
>>1330500
Wouldn't be the first time that happened anywhere.
Stay mad.
