> muh logic
> muh ethos
How about some of you faggots try endorsing endeavors with actual ends. You argue about the words of others like gospel, but shun the truth in scientific method like the plague. I guess it's fun to play smarty-pants with quotes and diatribe of ancient minds while true intellects carve the future with real progress. Doesn't tipping your fedora endlessly get tiring?
>>1324732
The scientific method is literally based on the philosophy of empiricism.
The first chapter of any science book is about the philosophy behind science.
While there are plenty of rather ridiculous philosophies and some humanities are bunk, you are a fucking moron if you don't think philosophy is important to practically applying the scientific method.
>>1324732
So who pissed in your cereal bowl there Mr. Special Snowflake? Is this a history or philosophy question or are you stirring things up with a shitpost like everybody you are apparently complaining about?
>>1324732
what did he mean by this?
>>1324739
Yet the product of this thought delves into the feelings of how things are, where the impetus gives way to innovation.
>>1324745
>posting Spider-Man and speaking of shitposting at the same time.
Yeah, you got me on the ropes there anon.
"Don't do it, Jimmy."
