Could a Christian theocracy succeed, or would it be brought down by corruption and revolution?
>>1313650
Hasn't this question already been answered by stripping the Papacy of legal authority?
>>1313650
There will always be some form of corruption with human's leading other humans. Even if it was a theocratic system that ruled on faith there would be corruption and people not interested/rebellious of the order. Theocracy can't really work anymore in the West, since most formerly Christian nations are secularized now.
>>1313759
Perhaps someone should start over from scratch.
>>1313650
Well, was the renassaince a better period of intellectual and human happiness? Enlightenment? Or now?
I'm honestly not sure but I feel that the resassiance was the height of human spirituality and intellect.
Personally I think the system of aristocracy and clergy checking and balancing each other was best in comparison to an all out theocracy.
I don't know if it would be brought down by revolution, but it is not acceptable at all.
>>1313825
>bringer of light
Fucking Apollon-Lucifer, fuck off. I fucking hate kekism, all kekists should be destroyed. Satanist rats all of them.
>>1313650
A true Christian theocracy would cuck itself to death, much like Sweden is doing right now.
>>1313650
Depends on where it manifested. If it was in a typically Christian area prone to fundamentalism, it wouldn't be much of a change.
In the USA, a lot of self proclaimed bible thumping patriots would probably burn the court house down when their daughters started being tried for the crime of being a witch.
