>>1362236
>Bearded Greek heads

>>1362236
So strange sentences, strange word uses, strange grammer, strange combinations of arguments can still be enlightning.
Perhaps to make us understand certain new ideas and ways of thought the use of never before seen sentence structures and combinations of arguments is required.

Perhaps things we take for granted, even the most basic things like "fallacies" can be challanged but to make a person think about challnaging them a text has to do it so that when a person reads it and gives it the benefit of the doubt he is then able to challange some basic understanding he has and suddenly become aware of how it can be thought about differently.

Did you ever achieve like to be if it was seriously and over with?

>>1362265
You see, you can ask to a certain extent wether all posts on 4chan can be considered valueable information that should be analyzed.
Your commic statment is also indicatie of certain things and can be interesting to think about.

This is where authority and persuasion come into play.
How does an author make sure his good ideas are explored?
For a philosopher it means getting a proper philosophical education with credentials so he is taken seriously by other philosophers and so they even look at what he writes.
Then there is also the way in which he writes that can either be engaging or not.
Here comes the question of what makes a text have a potential for interesting and fruitful interpretations?

>>1362236
The axioms of philosophy are that existence exists, consciousness exists, and the law of identity.