Is there anything worse than this? A retard ending a debate with "I win" before I even get a word in eh. I can't even begin to describe how stupid this person was.
>>1306524
Insert something about internet arguments and special olympics.
>you can't just go to the gym and get some intelligence
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9450.1965.tb01047.x/abstract
>>1306530
This guy literally argued that we should keep blacks in the gene pool becuase Muh BBC. Kek.
>>1306532
Of course of course. But this isn't really comparable to the way getting fit works.
>>1306524
You both look like massive idiots.
>>1306524
>becuase
>there
>their
>Were
Dear God.
>>1306539
It's currently 6:02 AM. I've been awake for over 24 hours. I was also trying to type as fast as possible becuase he kept saying "I win" and trying to leave.
Also pic related.
>>1306535
>yes, yes anon. However
If you state something you should give a reason for your statement. If intelligence is a social construct (which it is btw) your argument false apart. If it isn't and tests are the empirical foundation to prove that, you will have problems maintaining your initial point if those tests can be influenced by training.
>>1306551
>Social construct.
Average IQ in order
Ashkenazi Jew
East Asian
White/European
Hispanic
African American
Sub Saharan Africa.
>this is just some social construct to keep the black man down!!!!!
>>1306554
Do you know what a social construct is? It has nothing to do with your American pseudo-politics. Maybe you should read Ludwik Fleck (Ashkenazi Jew i.e. giga-smart) or Thomas Kuhn on the social influence of any scientific process. How people who usually bash any social science claim that the IQ-test somehow is objective is merely laughable. I am sure there is also a bias section on the wiki article. It might have more than 20 words but maybe you can swallow it. Also kudos for not addressing any of my substantial points.
https://benambridge.wordpress.com/2016/05/22/the-2-question-iq-test/
In all seriousness, has there ever been a good faith argument on the internet before?
>>1306576
Not with an OP like this.
