>King James Version
What went wrong?
>not knowing latin
>>1304671
>not knowing Koine Greek and Hebrew
>not reading the Septuagint in its original language
>trusting divine word through a human proxy.
>>1304677
this
Literally any version is shit.
>>1304633
They took a look at certain passages which would reveal problems in the official party line, and so decided to 'fix' them, so that the ignorant plebs wouldn't be led to the wrong type of heresy.
>>1305675
Which passages are you referring to?
>>1305671
Yep.
Earliest new testament was decided upon by a bunch of corrupt priests and a pagan emperor who had a suspiciously [citation needed] """"deathbed conversion""""
The dopest shit Jesus supposedly said wasn't included in the bible, and was likely written earlier than some of the shit that was.
And even the earliest shit was written ~70CE 40 years after he did the whole crucifixion thing, and was written by diasporic Jews trying to create a new religion because fuck Rome a resurrected peasant God will make Panem et circeses and riots inevitable
Everything, everything went wrong.
I believe that the King James Bible is the word of God.
God has blessed us with His truth manifest using the exact words in human language that God wants to be used.
There is one and only one legitimate Bible. The KJV.
The KJV sings.
The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.
- Ps. 12:6
>the book of enoch isn't included in 95% of all western bibles
that's the true bullshit tbqh
>>1306054
Genesis has the exact same information just not in such detail and the BoE is readily available for those who want those details.
