If the Gospel of John is written by a presumably Judean native and eyewitness, why can't he tell the difference between Hebrew and Aramaic?
Where exactly does the writer fail to do so?
>>1263024
Following the Battle of Vercellae in 101 BC Marius granted all Italian soldiers Roman citizenship. He justified this action to the Senate by saying in the din of battle he could not distinguish Roman from ally. This effectively eliminated the notion of allied legions; henceforth all Italian legions would be regarded as Roman Legions.
>>1263027
John 19 verses 13 and 17 have him explicitly calling Aramaic words Hebrew.
>>1263072
Those verses mention that they're Aramaic. JIDF standards have really gone down.
>>1263228
No they don't.
>>1263234
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John%2019&version=NIV
>>1263255
That's a correction put in by the translators t b h.
>>1263255
>trusting the NIV
http://biblehub.com/interlinear/john/19.htm
Ἑβραϊστὶ
>Hebristi
>In the Hebrew.
Christards btfo
Gospel of John has some good lines, but I feel that it ultimately stresses Jesus' divinity too much so that it diminishes his suffering, which in turn is crucial to the beauty and tragedy of his sacrifice. Luke is the better of the Gospels, from a character perspective.
