Hi everybody Stefan Molyneux from freedomainradio I hope you're doing well!
Spanking your kids is the direct cause of all the world's evils, specifically wars and the government, which is an immoral system centralised around the monopoly of violence to commit taxation, which is nothing else but theft at gunpoint, a gross violation of the Non-Aggression principle. Any arguments against these are actually not an argument because of my own moral framework that I invented that you cannot refute because speaking to me is proof that my framework is correct and evidence of Universally Preferable Behaviour. Therefore I literally cannot be wrong because everything is literally not an argument. The only way we can slay the great beast that is the government is for you to donate more than one fucking dollar. If you call in we will have a discussion about how your daddy's rich and your momma's good lookin', but she was an evil vile woman who is a child abuser because she fought with her husband in front of you once. If my mother weren't my mother she would be FUCKING DEAD! I would have FUCKING KILLED HER! You must go to therapy and defoo because spending time around people that WANT YOU SHOT is suicidal. Throughout the call I will constantly interrupt you, and scold you if you do the same to me, but that's okay because I have the largest philosophy show in the history of humanity. However, I will not hesitate to hang up on you if you admit that free will does not exist, because I don't debate with robots.
t. the world`s greatest living philosopher
When are you going to make Black & White 3?
sage'd
>>1262085
Who is this guy, who listens to this kind of shit except troubled autists, and why are you emulating him?
>>1262106
is he not more of a cult leader than anything else?
>>1264566
He's more of a turd circling the drain than anything else.
ONE
>>1262091
I don't know why this comment is here but but holy fuck I want b&w3 so bad and it better not suck like 2 did.
>>1264602
FUCKING
>>1264638
WHITE
>>1264655
BEADY
>>1262085
he's a yt "celebrity" altho he isn't really famous, being a youtuber is literally his only job, he makes a living off it
more views = more money.
any idiot will tell you that controversial shit will bring you more views than rational/accepted ones.
he understood that and is going down the road of being controversial sluts like Kardishan, lady gaga, etc ...and other people who make bucks by being noisy.
there is nothing "philosophical" about what he does, he spends all his days ranting about various politics and current event.
you could hear the same lines in any bar.
>>1262085
>>1262085
>Spanking your kids is the direct cause of all the world's evils, specifically wars and the government...
You know, he says this but then gives the stat that something like 90+% of the world spanks their kids. So obviously, we are not all psychopathic mass murderers so whats his point again?
>>1264847
>>1264852
>>1264856
pic related.
>>1264859
>>1262092
sage =/= downvote reddit
>>1264878
>patriarchy
>rape culture
He isn't wrong about those, at least in the modern west. Straight up memes tbqh.
Not denying he's gone cull on crazy tho, I ain't no /pol/ack.
>>1262085
Didnt he recently go full on /pol/? except naming jews..
>>1267619
Give it time. He'll get there. As long as his biggest supporters are alt-right types, he'll drift further and further into their camp.
Why do you people consider it non-philosophy? Isn't it abstract enough for you or what.
>>1267978
He's a political polemicist, not a philosopher.
>>1267986
He doesn't only talk about politics, though. The libertarian tradition is a legitimate philosophical discourse.
Besides, pic related
>>1262085
>>1262085
>>1267986
A political polemicist CAN be a philosopher. If you look outside the memes he does postulate his own ideas and while with a flavour of politics, some of them are definitely philosophical in nature.
>>1268378
>The libertarian tradition is a legitimate philosophical discourse.
How exactly? It's a political spectrum, nothing more.
>Besides, pic related
And who was asking for an argument?
>>1268522
> If you look outside the memes he does postulate his own ideas
I've quite literally never once seen him do this. I've seen him use other peoples's ideas, but I can't think of a single original one for Molyneaux.
Not to mention that he's never done anything with actual academic rigor, and the one thing that he tried with, writing UPB, was a colossal clusterfuck.
