>"You are to take life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise."
- YHWH
>>1251400
No surprise that the Jew Saul-Paul (the actual founder of Christianity) didn't want the goyim to think like that and instead preached that masochist, self-destructive and cucked "Love thy enemies and turn the other cheek" BS to them.
Old covenant was carnal, new covenant is spiritual. Hence cleanliness is not longer clinical, but spiritual, and initiation is no longer carnal, but spiritual.
Well, you can't get fair than that, can you? Out of all the things God's supposed to have said this is probably one of the more reasonable ones tbqh.
>>1251400
That was the Code of Hammurabi, not the torah, you fucktwat.
>>1251583
It's literally Exodus 21:23-25
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus+21%3A23-25&version=NIV
>>1251416
>the actual founder of Christianity
stale meme
The jewish protestants tweaked their message for a race with a roman boot on their face
>>1251400
>Thou Shall Not Kill
>>1251666
No surprise Satan loves Paul the Deceiver.
>>1251416
>He wasn't a cunning sociopath with a wicked sense of humor like me, using my valuable time debunking so called Christian "morality" on a Vijayanagaran mimeograph symposium.
>>1251694
>Vijayanagaran mimeograph symposium
I gotta remember that one.
>>1251400
I personally don't interpret it (or many other things) as mainstream Christians do. I interpret it as "no more than an eye for an eye, a life for a life". So, if someone does something, the punishment should be proportionate to the crime, as in not over-doing the punishment, or in other words it is a "limit", not a justification. You might not punish another for a trespass at all, as if any of this matters, you don't take any of this with you.
>>1251400
>No more than "life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise"
Of course you could pardon wrongs if you want. These were limitation statutes.
>>1251400
In most cases you would end up creating an unending chain of retaliation, either don't do anything and move on with your life or take it one step further and damage your enemy in a way which he can't retaliate ever again (doesn't necessarily mean killing)
