Thread replies: 7
Thread images: 1
Anonymous
2016-06-01 01:36:26 Post No. 1222147
[Report]
Image search:
[Google]
Anonymous
2016-06-01 01:36:26
Post No. 1222147
[Report]
How does one properly define Agnosticism in a context or at least in some semblance of order like it could be done with any other religion?
Beside explaining the lack of position, a suspension of judgement until sufficient "proofs" so to say, what could you say? Cite authors on the matter? Like Huxley that defined it more as a method, akin to the scientific method.
Imagine being told to talk about Christianity, you can talk about it from an historical point, a sociological,
anthropological view, talk about the rituals, the relationship with the supernatural, God, Deities, spirits, ecc.
Then compare it to, imagine being told to talk about or even research about agnosticism, it seems rather devoid of content.
