Who was in the right here?
>>1201099
Both had persuasive points.
>>1201099
>>1201273
throwing in the wild card
>>1201099
neither. both are men that just want to fight in wars.
There is no Mafia
I never realised it but the guy on the left looks like the philosopher Otto Weininger. Is it Trotsky?
Well, Gramsci won in the end
>>1202100
It's Antonio Gramsci.
And OP Gramsci was in the right.
>>1202116
But italia is capitalist today, only because some commi brigade killed mussolini after cpitalist democrats did the work for them doesnt mean he himself won anything concerning the validation of his points.
>>1201099
One looks like a faggot, one had a Lion cub as a pet, you choose faggot.
>>1202140
Dude having something as tacky as a lion for a pet is gay as fuck.
>>1202152
>tacky
Only fags and women use this word.
>>1202159
If you have enough of a frame of reference on being called tacky to know that then maybe you should consider why.
>>1202155
They only have that because over the spectacular crashdown of national socialism it is seen as more evil then the equally totalitarian redstates in the east the latter's imagenery isnt as hated and feared.
"Communist Hegemony" is basically just the forms of control and feelgood bullshit it has to offer.
The economy will stay basically the same.
>>1201099
Necessarily Mussolini. Gramsci's work is non-normative.
>>1202168
lions are the basic bitch of flexing your wealth anyways
>>1203416
I'm sorry who doesn't want a fluffy death machine
>>1203297
Then Gramsci is right?
>>1203424
I prefer miniature fluffy death machines, you can have more of them.
>>1201099
Obviously Mussolini. He did good for Italy despite being an incompetent buffoon when it came to a lot of things (i.e. Military commander). Gramsci was just another dumb Commie faggot.
