What does /his/ think of Evidentialism i.e. the philosophy that you should have evidence for your beliefs and reasoning.
Are there any good arguments for anti-evidentialism?
Lol do you mean logical positivism?
It's dog shit, bourgeois epistemology
>>1189460
>Are there any good arguments for anti-evidentialism?
Does self-evidence counts as evidence?
>>1189585
No, he clearly said evidentialism, you cretin.
>>1189460
Oh Sam...
But why does a belief require evidence to be valid? what makes evidence necessary?
>>1189585
>Lol do you mean logical positivism?
Are you a fucking retard?
>bourgeois
Well that answers that.
>>1190433
>>1189460
Logically there's no other option.
Unfortunately most people refuse to think logically.
>>1189460
>anti-evidentialism
literally 'muh feelings,' the philosophy