What is /his/'a opinion on this book?
>>1186073
/his/'s, my bad.
Bullshit pseudohistory with a dash of futurist speculation to boot.
The guy should stick to medieval military history.
>>1186073
I thought his treatment of prehistoric culture was great.
Lost interest as he started to go off on tangents about legal theory 'n' modern applications of anthropology 'n' shit.
>>1186073
It started off really good but got progressively worse over the course of the book.
>>1186073
>opinion on this book?
TL;DR