is /his/ an appropriate place to discuss economic theory and methodology?
>>1147765
Yes. Marx already solved it all though.
>>1147827
Well, /biz/ is basically dead and the /sci/ hivemind doesn't respect anything that isn't a really hard science so any kind of discussion there is improbable to impossible. It is a social science, and I see a lot of anthropology and historical sociology go on in this board so I figured it could fit in
>>1147912
Marx did not "solve" economics. Even contemporary Marxian economists, ideologues that they are, recognize the limits of his ideas. Okishio's theorem, etc.
>>1148281
That's false, Marx is widely heralded as the greatest economist ever.
>>1148577
What?
>>1148275
/biz/ is dead? It's more active than /cgl/ at least.
I think the problem there is that everyone just wants to make a quick buck, not discuss theory.
>>1148577
Marx had some great ideas but also very flawed ones as seen in his views into things like economics or the justice system and criminals.
"it's all a meme"
-friedrich engels, 1844
>>1147912
Truth.
>>1147765
Take your pseudoscientific mumbo jumbo back to /x/ you stupid idiot.
>>1148275
/biz/ isn't dead, it's just a stock circlejerk
>>1149879
t. economic illiterate who fell for the pop culture meme that finance and economics are just made up bullshit with numbers that people pull out of their ass