What is the endgame of philosophy?
grow the mind of the animal known as human
Truth, enlightenment, fulfillment, etc
What is a "well-motivated position" in philosophy? It's not worth its own thread but I keep seeing it and I don't know what it really means.
Sophistry.
I think the only logically consistent worldviews are complete life denial/anti-natalism or complete life affirmation to a degree where war, suffering, death, and enjoyment all increase exponentially forever, so Icycalm basically. Everyone in between is a hypocrite, like alt-righters who claim to love Nietzsche but still keep pretenses of morality or whatever
I desperately wish I could find religion, I want off this ride
>>1045614
Philosophy is one dead end after another.
>>1045614
Stirner.
>>1045733
>Nietzsche
>Camus
>Kierkegaard
>Schopenhauer
I wouldn't call Stirner's ideas "all encompassing"
>>1045501
k selection vs R selection.
>>1045671
Is there a word for the latter?
The end of philosophy is basically solipsism
There really is nothing past that point
>>1045501
>philosophy has an endgame
Philosophy will progressively expand and change as long as human intelligence and knowledge becomes better over the decades, just as technology and civilization does.
>>1045501
Retain publishing rights.
Understanding the philosophy of Aristotle.
