Is talking about the atrocities of the Japanese Empire allowed?
>inb4 user was banned for this post
>>1030
If we can talk about the atrocities of the British, Dutch, French and American Empires then sure, why not?
German Empires don't count because it's ridiculous to even call any of the previous German states an "empire"
reminder that the japanese were 100x more barbaric and bloodthirsty than the germans during ww2 and deserved both bombs
>>1030
Yes
Japan did nothing wrong
>>1339
did the civilians deserve the bombs?
>>1030
What are these atrocities you are referring to?
>implying Hiro-sama would allow it
DELETE THIS
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanking_Massacre
>>1411
total war is a bitch like that. the japanese would have gladly used them as suicide bombers and cannon fodder if they had a chance to beat the allies though.
>>1383
This
>japanese "atrocities"
[citation needed]
>>1576
did the civilians deserve to be used as suicide bombers?
You're just deflecting the question/
>>1411
The government refused to surrender, even after being warned
>>2028
and you really think that's the fault of the populace?
During the last months of the war, Ishii was preparing for a long-distance attack on the United States. This operation, codenamed "Cherry Blossoms at Night", called for the use of airplanes to spread plague over Southern California at night. The plan was finalized on March 26, 1945. Five of the new I-400-class long-range submarines were to be sent across the Pacific Ocean, each carrying three Aichi M6A Seiran aircraft loaded with plague-infected fleas. The submarines were to surface near San Diego and launch the aircraft towards the target, either to drop the plague via balloon bombs, or to crash in enemy territory. Either way, the plague would then infect people in the area and kill perhaps tens of thousands. The mission was extremely risky for the pilots and submariners, likely a one-way kamikaze mission.
>>1508
You some kind of animal rights activist?
>>2104
No, not at all.
>>2104
>>1851
the line between civilian and combatant is very hazy in the case of total war. And even if you really wanna make a point that innocents died, yeah you're right. It had to be a crippling blow to the japanese to show we meant business and would wipe their whole country off the map if they didn't give up.
>>1411
Yesish.
If they weren't nuked, they'd have been slaughtered in the ensuing land invasion. Nuclear attack was justified to keep casualties down.
Doesn't the USA still have stocks of purple hearts they expected to give out because invading Japan conventionally would be so difficult?
Nanking never happened.
>>2987
Why do the nips deny everything?
>>3116
Pissing off the Chinese senpai
You mean the greatness?
Those chinks had it coming
