Is it okay to take someone from World War 2 that's still alive and portray them as a cute anime girl without their consent?
>>1000406
yes.
>>1000406
yes
>>1000406
It literally should be done to everyone ever always.
>>1000406
>without their consent
Especially this.
>>1000406
They fought for your right to do exactly that.
Honor their sacrifice with anime.
>>1000406
Why wouldn't you? Are you a faggot or something?
Can you still do it even if they are not alive?
>>1000406
Yes, but only if it's a cute girl. Anything else would be rude.
>>1000956
>can you
It's not about "can" it's about "should" and the answer is yes
>>1000406
How do you think he would react to this?
Do you think he would have encouraged the invasion of Japan or just nuking it more? It's so fucking weird to me, these things should never be in the same pic. The juxtaposition is just jarring.
No.
Placing Animegirls in historical images is about as cringey as placing MLP ponies in them.
Yes to drawing historical characters, no matter who as cute anime girls.
No to putting them in actual real world photographs unless for comedic effect I say this simply becase i recall that ghastly cross of vietnam and MLP. the one that really bothered me was the picture of the clearly distressed marine and the pony photoshopped in to look like its consoling him.
What made it worse was some idiot saying it was more powerful now it had a cartoon horse involved. If thats how you get the kids involved in history then keep it an old mans game i say.
>>1001782
>i recall that ghastly cross of vietnam and MLP
Where can I take a look at this?
>mfw it isnt a bare butt like the catalog's thumbnail promised, but an helmet
