Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 634. page
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
Should rights be limited to individuals or do we extend them to groups?
I don't understand the question. There are clearly two kinds of rights afforded by any civilized political system.
>>907929
so like limiting the rights of individuals in relation to the rights of minority groups.
I guess it boils down to multiculturalism vs melting pot.
>>907947
I still don't understand. So take for example the freedom of speech. We can think of hate speech laws as infringing upon non-minorities right to speak for the sake of improving the life of the minority. I think it makes sense in a particular historical context, for example, in post-war Germany because of the aim of denazification.
If Remus killed his brother Romulus instead of vice-versa, would we be today reading of the Reme empire? Or, would we be reading of an empire at all?
>>907707
No because Rome was named after a river in Umbria.
Romulus and Remus never actually existed.
The Roman founding myth is historicized Indo-European creation myth.
Remus is from an earlier *iemus, altered for alliteration, from Proto-Indo-European *yem-, 'twin', cognate with Old Norse Ymir and Sanskrit Yama. In all these stories he is killed by his brother.
>>907707
The Reman Empire
![8-the_normans[2].preview.jpg](https://i.imgur.com/BzOo1j6.jpg "8-the_normans[2].preview.jpg")
Redpill me on the Normans /his/
French people in Normandy
Were far more based than the vikings who contributed slightly to their lineage
>>907647
kek if not for the Norsemen Normandy would be just another irrelevant French province
>>907647
>descended from Norse
>vocabulary influenced by Norse language
>culture of conquest inherited from their Norse progenitors
Why can't Surrenderfags just admit they were a unique subculture of French?
Is currency the biggest con in the world? You're told something has value so it does, but what value does it truly have? It has no set value, so it cannot be truly defined. It will constantly fluctuate, so it'll be worth less or more.
People will kill for money, sell out their fellow human beings for money, slave away their days for it so they can buy useless things they really don't need to either appease themselves or others whose opinions should not matter.
It's not even the kikes that are to blame for this since currency was around for a long time. I'm not rich, but at the same time I'm not poor but I have my own garden, know people that I can trade labour to for meat or vegetables or really anything foodage wise. Barter systems still kind of exist where I live (in a rural area where most people already own their land/have farms/etc) and no one minds doing a helpful thing for a neighbour and receiving honey or meat or vegetables or what-have-you. No money involved. I don't even live in some weird hippie commune either.
What a strange thing money is. What do you think?
Are you 12?
>>907348
No.
>>907343
It's backed in violence, instead of gold. You have to pay your taxes in money or aggressive means will be taken against you. This goes for all of the other laws regarding money, as well. The money is good because the people with military power say it's good.
