Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 609. page
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
What is this "narrative" reddit keeps talking about? Who's narrating, anyway?
Old Evil white racist men
>>905036
i wouldent know
why dont you ask reddit
>>905041
I got banned from le reddit for changing the narrative.
redpill me on heraklious
>>905011
a meme philosopher on par with Nietzsche. Vastly inferior to Parmenides
>>905011
Held off the Persians but got pretty much oversaw the beginning for the end for the Romans by losing Syria and Egypt- though its unsure whether any emperor could have held that back
For some reason the Muslims still say he was a bretty good guy.
What are some good secondary sources to Max Stirner?
I currently have "Individuality and the Social Organism" and Stirner's biography on order.
>>905007
There is a book of sorts that Saul Newman, a solid political theorist wrote with a few other Stirner fans/theorists that "frames" stirner plausibly well in modern times.
I cannot remember the name at the moment and i do not have it at hand but it may well be titled
'Max Stirner' by Newman, check for pdfs
>>905007
Nietzsche
Let's be honest, /his/, would anything CLOSE to Jurassic Park be possible?
>>>/sci/
sage
There are literally 4 of them already made
Whats the best form of architecture and why is it baroque?
muh 3's
>>904971
It may be a better style but the best architect is still specialised in Islamic Architecture. His name is Mimar Sinan and he's the best
>>905132
Cho Cho!
/his/ how did we handle the refugee influx during the Yugoslav wars.
How did integration go about, and when the war ended how did the return to the home country go about. Can we draw any parrallels with today?
>>904588
No. The scale, demographics, and sociological background of the people is far different.
At the same time the Yugoslavians were distributed much better in the past than the current "refugees".
How did the most influential people of the 20th century (ranging from Ghandi to Hitler and Stalin) become who they were?
Also, what were their greatest weaknesses which prevented them from becoming even more influential?
pic unrelated
You're not going to get a straight answer for that, as it falls back on the old, man makes the moment, the moment makes the man argument.
Who are your heroes, /his/?
I'm talking about real people, not fictitious chracters.
Mine are
>Jesus of Nazareth
>Jan Hus
>José Buenaventura Durruti Dumange
>Charles Manson
>Theodore Koczynski
>I'm talking about real people, not fictitious chracters.
>Jesus of Nazareth
>>904496
Oh boy, something bit!
But yeah, I'm talking about the dude who was allegedly preaching and was killed for it, not the miracle worker who is also the son of god.
itt we talk about the absolute madman and based philosopher that Diogenes of Sinope was
>plato makes the definition of a man as featherless bipeds
>diogenes plucks a chicken
>takes it to Pllatos Academy
>"Behold! I have brought you a man!"
What are some good books/articles/theories that deal with power relationships between humankind and "nature". Nature in this sense I define as the sum of all non-human lifeforms (animals, bacteria, plants, funghi, algae, etc) and non-manmade environmental structures (mountains, woods, oceans, etc).
I'm looking for something that emphasizes the dialogical nature of power relationships, and focuses not just on one side of the argument. (i.e. How does man exert power over nature and how does nature exert power over man).
Something I found in another...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Look into deep ecologists like Pentti Linkola, even though he is a bit of a doomsday prophet if that is something you do not like.
bumping for interest
thread theme
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUVmcKcTZ4A
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/4239/4239-h/4239-h.htm
>weaboo
>teaboo
>ouiabeaux
>chinaboo
>weedaboo
>swedeaboo
What is worst in context of a historical or cultural discussion?
I was surprised it wasn't the lafcadio hearns of the world as one would think.
Christcucks
No nationality comes even close
>>904154
Is that Naropa/Tilopa?
>>904158
This, definitely Christards.
/his/ comedy material.
What do you listen to or watch to get a laugh when you're down? I find anything with this round headed buffoon in it to be really funny.
https://youtu.be/G72MTe0obvQ
>>904129
ayy lmao
>>904129
I did not know about this show, but I am falling in love with it. Thanks, OP.
Hey guys, things are looking up now that the French have been beaten into line. Your borders are now secure from land attacks by those absolute monarchists from the North. Moreover their army and navy have been beaten into line and they can't afford to rearm any time soon.
However there is a bit of a problem: fighting a war against France around the world is kind of expensive. As such we're introducing a Stamp Tax in the colonies. It's not a big thing and I know it's going to be a bit of an annoyance, however we need to pay our redcoats buy them muskets...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>904130
Glad to see you approve, the Empire sends it's thanks!
:)
ITT we write a letter to the sultan one word at a time
''Zaporozhian Cossacks to the Turkish Sultan!
Thou...
>>904056
wuz
>>904061
/thread
Just smear it into some shit and send it already.
I keep hearing this meme that Nazism was Judaism for the gentles. Is there any substance to it?
+ National identity is superseeded by your "race" or more correctly volk. Only the jews had this kind of identity, the other peoples of Europe and Germans especially considered themselves only Christians.
+ Reviving ancient mystisism
+ A worship of the patriarchy
+ pan-Germanism = Zionism
Where did you get that from? I've never heard anybody claim that. I've heard that Zionism is fascism, though.
>>903828
I'm not an expert on Nazi Germany by any means but here's what I know:
>+ National identity is superseeded by your "race" or more correctly volk. Only the jews had this kind of identity, the other peoples of Europe and Germans especially considered themselves only Christians.
Nazism was mostly German integral nationalism. Concept of race was honestly quite stupid and political in Nazi Germany, as far as I know. For instance, Ukrainians have been "reconsidered"...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>903828
>I keep hearing this meme that Nazism was Judaism for the gentles. Is there any substance to it?
Never heard of that before and it seems like a silly comparison
> National identity is superseeded by your "race" or more correctly volk. Only the jews had this kind of identity, the other peoples of Europe and Germans especially considered themselves only Christians.
Considering yourself German means you are of that Volk and speak the language....
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
