Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 266. page
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
"Water is the origin of all things."
What the heck did he mean by this?
He was thirsty
>>1255858
Don't know why but this made me laugh hard.
>>1255854
"It's not the gods fucking around."
What is the story behind this picture?
Whenever I research all I can find is:
"Barge lifts soviet train from water" - Finland WWII
How did it get there?
Why are they trying to salvage it rather than leaving it there?
Who What When Where Why
>>1255761
Is it part of the Ladoga ice train during WW2? That's about the only thing I can think of that might be of interest to someone and would be at the bottom of the water and in Finnish territory now.
>>1255766
Well it's not from now, it's from then. (1942ish)
There isn't a single barnacle on it. It wasn't there for long.
They got a barge out there so clearly it was totally submerged.
How would a locomotive engine get totally submerged without falling off a bridge?
>>1255783
>Well it's not from now, it's from then. (1942ish)
That would be the right timeframe
>There isn't a single barnacle on it. It wasn't there for long.
I don't THINK you have barnacles at Lake Ladoga, but I honestly don't know. That might or might not be disposative.
>How would a locomotive engine get totally submerged without falling off a bridge?
Again,...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Why is the killing of a captured pilot considered wrong? Let's get past the fact that most of us already didn't like the people doing it and actually look at this with commonly accepted logic.
Those who do not allow others to surrender should not be allowed to surrender. This was the rationale for executing SS prisoners in WWII, or U-Boat crews. Pilots, naturally do not ask for surrender, nor are they capable of accepting it. Why then is killing them considered morally wrong?
The normal incentive for not executing pilots on the spot is the threat of...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>1255622
>You basically have no means of defense
How'd did he get shot down in the first place then?
These nigs have MANPAD's outta the wazoo, of course they have a means of defense against air attacks.
>>1255622
The problem isn't killing him (which is barbaric) the problem is that they tried to use him as a bargaining chip even though he was already dead; which makes them not just savages, but treacherous ones as well
>>1255634
If they were better at it they would be doing it more. They have no lack of motivation.
Please redpill me on protestantism, /his/
What were the conditions which allowed for its apparition ?
How and why did it spread ?
Who was converting ?
And no theological bullshit please, I don't care about the religions themselves, just their history
>>1255578
>>1255578
>What were the conditions which allowed for its apparition ?
The prohibition of usury enforced by the church
>What were the conditions which allowed for its apparition ?
european nobility wanted to sack churches and needed an excuse to do it
>Who was converting ?
uneducated peasants
>>1255578
Then I recommend Chaucer. Lots of Chaucer: Or read any popular history of the papacy in the middle ages and renaissance. The utter ease with which Thomas Cromwells Commissioners gathered evidence of abuses and assurances of willingness to Dissolve from the Abbots, tells its own story.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dissolution_of_the_Lesser_Monasteries_Act
>Fard Muhammad
Where did he come from?
Where did he disappear to?
Hell
>>1255230
>Hell
Good answer for both questions.
>>1255317
>being papist scum
What do we really know about this person? Is he really a historic figure, or is he just literary fiction? Are there proofs of his existence and what do we really know for certain about his life?
Regardless of the other details of his life, there is a historical consensus that these three facts are true:
He was baptized
He was crucified
His followers believed he rose from the dead
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus_on_Jesus#Testimonium_Flavianum
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacitus_on_Christ
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/godlessindixie/2014/09/04/an-atheists-defense-of-the-historicity-of-jesus/
>"He certainly existed, as virtually every competent scholar of antiquity, Christian or non-Christian, agrees"
- Bart Ehrman
>"There are those who argue that Jesus is a figment of the Church’s imagination, that there never was a Jesus at all. I have to say that I do not know any respectable critical scholar who says that any more.
- Michael Grant
>"In recent years, 'no serious scholar has ventured to postulate the non historicity of Jesus' or at any rate very few, and they have not succeeded in disposing of the much stronger, indeed very abundant, evidence to the contrary.
- Richard Burridge
He was a carpenter
>>1254852
You know as much about Jesus as you want to know, at all times, and in ever increasing increments.
You can know nothing, or you can know Him personally, develop a relationship, and live in awe of Him every moment of every day, knowing that it will take an eternity to fully know Him as He knows us.
Each man can choose what level He is at; but like Pilate, each man must decide what He will do with this Jesus, this King of the Jews.
What would Jesus do?
>>1254816
move the trolley with his wizard powers off the track
>>1254816
Lie on the track himself to stop all of them.
Turn one trolley to two like with fish and bread.
Why do hipsters get this flag tattooed on them?
>>1254768
because it looks cool
t. hipster
Because they enjoy raping and executing innocent people of course.
>>1254836
Kek
What were legal systems in medieval Europe like? How were laws enforced and by who?
By the mothafuckin king, you pleb
>>1255847
Lol, that's what they wished.
In reality it was a clusterfuck, many noblemen had rights of administering justice, which they obviously abused. Providing impartial justice was one of the way the "New Monarchs" of the 15th and 16th centuries found of extending their power at the expense of the nobility.
One very peculiar legal system was the "March law" of Anglo-Scottish border.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_law_%28Anglo-Scottish_border%29
>>1255856
Not him but you understand the dates you listed are pretty much outside the scope of medieval Europe.
The New Chronology is a fringe theory regarded by the academic community as pseudohistory, which argues that the conventional chronology of Middle Eastern and European history is fundamentally flawed, and that events attributed to the civilizations of the Roman Empire, Ancient Greece and Ancient Egypt actually occurred during the Middle Ages, more than a thousand years later. The central concepts of the New Chronology are derived from the ideas of Russian scholar Nikolai Morozov (1854–1946), although work by French scholar Jean Hardouin (1646–1729) can be viewed as an earlier predecessor.
Pour mes Frenchies...
https://matricien.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/ou-est-donc-passe-le-moyen-age-franc3a7ois-de-sarre.pdf
Quand tu apprends que Jean a écrit l'Apocalypse en 1486....
> Do you even into comet dating bro?
This is map of Global Horde which is actually Russia in the II, VII and XVIII centuries.
>Weep, you girls. My penis has given you up. Now it penetrates men’s behinds. Goodbye, wondrous femininity!
What did he mean by this ?
>>1254186
Fuck off memeshit
>>1254186
Who?
Some things never change
When will Protestants apologize for this?
When will Catholics apologize for Protestants
When will early Christians apologize for Catholics
When will Jews apologize for early Christians
Guyyyyysss....
Some dog followed me home.
I called the owner but shes not picking up
. She keeps eating EVERYTHING but I kicked her out to the garden but there shes pooping everywhere.
What am I supposed to doooooo. My parents are getting home soon
Not sure if my dogs are liking her
>>1253795
Give her a good home, anon. She deserves it
>>1253811
There's only two rooms in my house and no money
>Sacked greece
>Sacked Egypt
>Sacked judea
>Sacked carthage
>Sacked gaul
Was there any one more toxic to civilization than roman niggers?
Mongols
Christians
Germans. Germans have been trying to destroy Europe for their entire existence as a people.
What caused WW1?
Who is to blame?
Archaic European militarism and a whole bunch of treaties
There's a lot of blame to go around. But mostly Austria-Hungary and Russia.
>>1253670
Don't forget the Belgians for existing
